What is the Pauli-Lubanski Pseudo-Vector and How Can its Invariance be Proven?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter udaraabey
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the derivation of the square of the Pauli-Lubanski pseudo-vector, denoted as W2. Participants reference the equation Wa=(1/2)EabcdMbcPd and aim to prove W2=-(1/2)MabMabP2+MacMbcPaPb. Key identities used include the antisymmetry of M_{ab} and the Levi-Civita symbol identity. The conversation highlights challenges in obtaining a non-zero result for the Pauli-Lubanski pseudo-vector, with some users encountering a trivial solution of W=(0,0,0,0).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Pauli-Lubanski pseudo-vector in quantum field theory
  • Familiarity with tensor notation and antisymmetry properties
  • Knowledge of the Levi-Civita symbol and its applications
  • Basic principles of relativistic quantum mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Pauli-Lubanski pseudo-vector in detail
  • Explore the implications of the Levi-Civita symbol in tensor calculus
  • Investigate the physical significance of the Pauli-Lubanski vector in particle physics
  • Learn about the role of invariants in quantum field theories
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, graduate students in theoretical physics, and researchers focusing on quantum field theory and particle physics who seek to deepen their understanding of the Pauli-Lubanski pseudo-vector and its invariance properties.

udaraabey
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hi

I’m wondering if anybody could help me to prove the result of W2 (square of the pauli-lubanski pseudo-vecor).
 
Physics news on Phys.org


udaraabey said:
Hi

I’m wondering if anybody could help me to prove the result of W2 (square of the pauli-lubanski pseudo-vecor).

See first equation on page 117 of http://www.arxiv.org/abs/physics/0504062

Eugene.
 


Thank you for your reply but in my case I need to start with

Wa=(1/2)EabcdMbcPd

And to end with

W2=-(1/2)MabMabP2+MacMbcPaPb

Could anybody tell me how to derive this
 


Could anybody tell me how to derive this

use the identity

<br /> \epsilon_{a}^{bcd}\epsilon^{a \bar{b} \bar{c} \bar{d}} = - \left| \begin{array}{ccc} \eta^{\bar{b}b} &amp; \eta^{\bar{c}b} &amp; \eta^{\bar{d}b} \\ \eta^{\bar{b}c} &amp; \eta^{\bar{c}c} &amp; \eta^{\bar{d}c} \\ \eta^{\bar{b}d} &amp; \eta^{\bar{c}d} &amp; \eta^{\bar{d}d} \end{array} \right|<br />

and

M_{ab} = - M_{ba}


regards


sam
 


samalkhaiat said:
use the identity

<br /> \epsilon_{a}^{bcd}\epsilon^{a \bar{b} \bar{c} \bar{d}} = - \left| \begin{array}{ccc} \eta^{\bar{b}b} &amp; \eta^{\bar{c}b} &amp; \eta^{\bar{d}b} \\ \eta^{\bar{b}c} &amp; \eta^{\bar{c}c} &amp; \eta^{\bar{d}c} \\ \eta^{\bar{b}d} &amp; \eta^{\bar{c}d} &amp; \eta^{\bar{d}d} \end{array} \right|<br />

and

M_{ab} = - M_{ba}


regards


sam

i tried to get an explicit form of this (Pauli-Lubanski pseudo vector) and i keep getting
zero. i.e W=(0,0,0,0)...which would still make it an invariant; albeit a boring one.
Looking at the form too, with M_ab=-M_ba it does seem that it should be zero.
Can someone tell me what i might be doing wrong. Thanks
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
15K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 59 ·
2
Replies
59
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K