How is Work Calculated for a Constantly Accelerating Rocket?

Nabeshin
Science Advisor
Messages
2,207
Reaction score
16
If I have a rocket constantly accelerating at some rate a, (requiring some constant force F), I want to know how much work is done by the rocket to travel a given proper length.

For example, a rocket traveling to alpha centauri at 1g acceleration half way and 1g acceleration the other half. It would seem work would just be F*d, however, the d should be as measured in the rocket's frame of reference. Would a correct method of deriving the d to be to take the velocity function of the rocket, integrate from 0 to some t (half way point), and then multiply by two (symmetry) to obtain total distance traveled in the frame of the rocket?

General note: the function I'm using for the time between two points also requires the measurement d. The equation is:
t=\frac{c}{a_0} Cosh^{-1}\left[1 + \frac{a_0 d}{c^2}\right]

with t being as measured on the ship. To get the time to the mid-way point (required for the above approach), is it valid to just set d/2? (and also multiply by two to get the entire shipboard time for the full voyage)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This might be helpful.

http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/SR/rocket.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thanks for the link, that's actually where I got the posted time equation.

The only possibly applicable equation is that under the section "below the rocket ..." but I don't think that's quite it. That equation gives the remaining distance, or current distance at any time T, whereas I want the total distance traversed in the frame of the rocket... Unless I'm missing some basic calculus I can't get what I need from that equation.
 
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'
See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
I started reading a National Geographic article related to the Big Bang. It starts these statements: Gazing up at the stars at night, it’s easy to imagine that space goes on forever. But cosmologists know that the universe actually has limits. First, their best models indicate that space and time had a beginning, a subatomic point called a singularity. This point of intense heat and density rapidly ballooned outward. My first reaction was that this is a layman's approximation to...
Back
Top