How large would the sun be if it were frozen?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter dennis_n
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sun The sun
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the size of the Sun if it were composed of liquid hydrogen and helium instead of gas. Participants emphasize that the average density of the Sun is 1410 kg/m³, while liquid hydrogen has a density of only 70 kg/m³, indicating that the Sun is denser than liquid hydrogen. The conversation highlights that if the Sun were to lose its energy source, it would compress to a state comparable to a white dwarf, resulting in a radius similar to that of Earth. Ultimately, a liquefied Sun would be approximately 2.7 times larger in diameter than its current state.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of stellar composition and density
  • Knowledge of the properties of hydrogen and helium
  • Familiarity with concepts of gravity and compression in astrophysics
  • Basic comprehension of white dwarf characteristics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties of liquid hydrogen and helium, including their densities
  • Explore the concept of electron degeneracy in white dwarfs
  • Study the average density variations within stars
  • Read about stellar evolution and the lifecycle of stars
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, astrophysics students, and anyone interested in stellar dynamics and the physical properties of celestial bodies will benefit from this discussion.

dennis_n
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
How much smaller would the sun be if all it's hydrogen and helium turned to liquid?
I can't figure out how to calculate this. But I thought it would be fun to visualize how much smaller in size a frozen sun would be compared to it's gas/plasma state.
Anyone?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
This should be pretty easy to compute. The Sun's mass composition can be readily found on the internet, as can the densities of liquid hydrogen and helium, which are the Sun's main components. Just take the masses of hydrogen and helium and compute the corresponding volume using the densities.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: unusually_wrong, PeroK and russ_watters
Orodruin said:
This should be pretty easy to compute. The Sun's mass composition can be readily found on the internet, as can the densities of liquid hydrogen and helium, which are the Sun's main components. Just take the masses of hydrogen and helium and compute the corresponding volume using the densities.

No, it isn´t.
Hydrogen and helium will be self-compressed by gravity.

White dwarf mass-radius relationships won´t help, either, because white dwarfs are carbon or heavier.
 
Orodruin said:
This should be pretty easy to compute. The Sun's mass composition can be readily found on the internet, as can the densities of liquid hydrogen and helium, which are the Sun's main components. Just take the masses of hydrogen and helium and compute the corresponding volume using the densities.
I thought that too, but then the gases change density from surface to core, so I thought a simple computation might not solve this.
 
snorkack said:
No, it isn´t.
Hydrogen and helium will be self-compressed by gravity.

White dwarf mass-radius relationships won´t help, either, because white dwarfs are carbon or heavier.
But this was not the question as I read it. The question as I read it is just "if the hydrogen and helium were liquid of the typical densities, how much volume would it occupy". It is obviously not going to happen in reality.
 
dennis_n said:
I thought that too, but then the gases change density from surface to core, so I thought a simple computation might not solve this.
You do not need the volume of the gases. You just need the mass.
 
The average density of the Sun is 1410 kg/m3
Liquid hydrogen has a density of only 70 kg/m3
Thus the Sun is already denser than liquid hydrogen would be.
If you were to remove the energy source that keeps the Sun from collapsing, it would compress until its core reaches a state of electron degeneracy. At this point you have the equivalent of a White Dwarf, and an object with a radius comparable to the Earth's.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: dennis_n and Imager
Janus said:
The average density of the Sun is 1410 kg/m3
Liquid hydrogen has a density of only 70 kg/m3
Thus the Sun is already denser than liquid hydrogen would be.
If you were to remove the energy source that keeps the Sun from collapsing, it would compress until its core reaches a state of electron degeneracy. At this point you have the equivalent of a White Dwarf, and an object with a radius comparable to the Earth's.

I never thought to search for average density. It was faulty logic to assume that an extremely compressed plasma core wouldn't increase the average density to more than that of a liquid or solid state. Might be the public misconception that stars are mainly bodies of "Gas" and "Plasma" and we conceive both of these as very light, only experiencing gas as the air around us and thinking of plasma as an even more expanded form of it. Thanks! I learned something new today.
 
Weird.
So a liquefied sun would be 2.7 times larger in diameter. (Using Janus's hydrogen density)
 
  • #10
I tried to figure out how big droplet of liquid He can exist.

By my estimate, somewhat smaller than Pluto, unless extra heating is provided. On account of the extra heating from relic radiation, a Pluto sized drop of He can be liquid without other heating.
 
  • #11
So, how is it that Jupiter has approximately the same density as the sun?

1300 kg/m^3 Jupiter
1410 kg/m^3 Sun​

Asking for a friend.

dennis_n said:
Thanks! I learned something new today.

I learned, by going down your rabbit hole, that I know way too little about how things work, on not-even-a-cosmic scale.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: nikkkom
  • #12
The sun has a larger variation in density. It's quite dense at the core and much less dense near the surface,
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: OmCheeto
  • #13
dennis_n said:
I never thought to search for average density. It was faulty logic to assume that an extremely compressed plasma core wouldn't increase the average density to more than that of a liquid or solid state. Might be the public misconception that stars are mainly bodies of "Gas" and "Plasma" and we conceive both of these as very light, only experiencing gas as the air around us and thinking of plasma as an even more expanded form of it. Thanks! I learned something new today.

Here is a good article from NASA with a nice density vs radius graphs:
https://solarscience.msfc.nasa.gov/interior.shtml
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: dennis_n and OmCheeto

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
8K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K