How long does it take for the 4.0 kg block to reach the floor?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves two blocks connected by a massless rope over a pulley, with specific parameters including the masses of the blocks and the pulley, as well as the torque due to friction. The question seeks to determine the time it takes for the 4.0 kg block to reach the floor after being released from rest.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the derivation of equations related to torque, acceleration, and the forces acting on the blocks. There are attempts to clarify the relationship between the variables involved, including the radius of the pulley and the effects of friction. Some participants question the correctness of derived equations and the application of values in calculations.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing feedback on each other's derivations and calculations. Some have identified potential errors in the application of parameters, particularly the radius of the pulley, while others are attempting to clarify their understanding of the relationships between the forces and accelerations involved.

Contextual Notes

There is a focus on ensuring that the correct values are used in calculations, particularly regarding the radius of the pulley and the effects of friction. Participants are also exploring the implications of treating the system as a single object versus multiple interacting components.

booboo21407
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The two blocks in the figure (Intro 1 figure) are connected by a massless rope that passes over a pulley. The pulley is 17 cm in diameter and has a mass of 2.0 kg. As the pulley turns, friction at the axle exerts a torque of magnitude 0.46 Nm .

If the blocks are released from rest, how long does it take the 4.0 kg block to reach the floor?

(Intro 1 Figure):http://session.masteringphysics.com/problemAsset/1070551/3/12.P70.jpg


Homework Equations



torque= r * F
sum of torques = moment of inertia * angular acceleartion
angular acceleration * radius = acceleration
x=v0t + 1/2 a t^2

The Attempt at a Solution



I now that v0 is o so the i solve for t in the equation, t = sqrt(2h / a).
a = [ F / r + (m1 - m2)g ] / (m1 + m2 + m3 / 2)

then i plug in a into t=sqrt(2h/a)
= sqrt{ h(2m1 + 2m2 + m3) / [ F / r + (m1 - m2)g ] }
=t = sqrt{ 1( 2 * 4 + 2 * 2 + 2) / [ 0.46 / 0.17 + (4 - 2)9.81 ] }
=.79s
I got it wrong, can anyone help me to see what i did wrong.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The diameter is 17cm, so your radius is half of that. Give that a try. I see you have 17 instead for radius.
 
booboo21407 said:
a = [ F / r + (m1 - m2)g ] / (m1 + m2 + m3 / 2)
Show how you derived this result.
 
This is how i found the equation for acceleration

Let:
m1 be the left hand mass,
T1 be the left hand tension,
m2 be the right hand mass,
T2 be the right hand tension,
g be the acceleration due to gravity,
a be the acceleration of the masses,
alpha be the angular acceleration of the pulley,
r be the radius of the pulley (assumed solid),
F be the friction couple,
h be the descent for m1,
t be the time taken.

For mass m1:
m1 g - T1 = m1 a
T1 = m1(g - a)

For mass m2:
T2 - m2 g = m2 a
T2 = m2(g + a)

For the pulley:
(T1 - T2)r - F = I alpha
= (m3 r^2 / 2)(a / r)

T1 - T2 = F / r + m3 a / 2

Eliminating T1 and T2:
m1(g - a) - m2(g + a) = F / r + m3 a / 2

(m1 - m2)g - (m1 + m2)a - m3 a / 2 - F / r
(m1 + m2 + m3 / 2)a = F / r + (m1 - m2)g

a = [ F / r + (m1 - m2)g ] / (m1 + m2 + m3 / 2)

Did i derieved it correctly?


Also did i solve for time corectly.
h = at^2 / 2
t = sqrt(2h / a)
= sqrt{ h(2m1 + 2m2 + m3) / [ F / r + (m1 - m2)g ]


Ok i see that i plug in the wrong number for the radius.
=t = sqrt{ 1( 2 * 4 + 2 * 2 + 2) / [ 0.46 / 0.085 + (4 - 2)9.81 ] }
t=.7478 s

is this answer correct?
 
booboo21407 said:
Eliminating T1 and T2:
m1(g - a) - m2(g + a) = F / r + m3 a / 2
OK.
(m1 - m2)g - (m1 + m2)a - m3 a / 2 - F / r
(m1 + m2 + m3 / 2)a = F / r + (m1 - m2)g
Redo this last step.
 
I don't understand wat you mean, did i made a mistake deriving it? i did over and i still got the same formula.
 
hmm I got

2g-Ff=ma and Ff*r=I*(a/r), where: a and Ff is unknown. how is this wrong?

you can't look at it like one object anymore?
 
Last edited:
booboo21407 said:
I don't understand wat you mean, did i made a mistake deriving it? i did over and i still got the same formula.
Everything you did up to and including where I said "OK" was good. You just made an algebraic mistake where I said "Redo this last step".
 
Thanks for your help, i figure out where i made an algebra mistake
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
8K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K