How long does the wheel slip before it begins to roll without slipping?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on determining the final translational speed of a wheel that transitions from slipping to rolling without slipping. The wheel has a rotational inertia of I = 0.5MR² and an initial angular speed of ω. The key relationship established is that the final translational speed (Vf) equals Rωi/3, where ωi is the initial angular speed. The torque acting on the wheel is given by MgRμ, and the relationship between linear acceleration (a) and angular acceleration (α) is defined as a = -0.5Rα.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of rotational dynamics and inertia (I = 0.5MR²)
  • Familiarity with the concepts of torque and angular acceleration
  • Knowledge of the relationship between linear and angular velocities
  • Basic algebra for solving equations involving motion
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of torque and its effects on rotational motion
  • Learn about the concept of rolling without slipping in physics
  • Explore the relationship between linear acceleration and angular acceleration in detail
  • Investigate real-world applications of rotational dynamics in engineering
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on mechanics, as well as educators looking for examples of rotational motion concepts.

PatF
Messages
17
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A wheel with rotational inertia I = 0.5MR^2 about its central axle is set spinning with initial angular speed w and is then lowered onto the ground so that it touches the ground with no horizontal speed. Initially it slips, but then begins to move forward and eventually rolls without slipping.

What is the wheel's final translational speed?

Homework Equations


I know that the torque where the wheel touches the ground is MgR*mu and that the angular momentum is initially Iw. Thus the angular momentum at time t is
I*(w-2*g*mu*w*t/R)


The Attempt at a Solution


I am missing something conceptual here. What does it mean physically so that the angular momentum decreases in such a way that it translates into linear momentum?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Think about the physical meaning of the phrases "rolls without slipping".

What does this imply is the relationship between rotational and translational velocity?
 
"Think about the physical meaning of the phrases "rolls without slipping".

What does this imply is the relationship between rotational and translational velocity?"


I am terribly sorry but I HAVE thought about this but it seems absolutely pointless. You might as well say that I should consider how the qstorb schlonges with the veeblefretz. That's how much sense it makes.

I admit freely that I am missing something. But if translational and rotational velocity are involved, I just do not see how.
 
OK. I think I have it now and I will write down the solution in case anyone else runs into the problem. I think the problem is lot subtler than it looks and the key is figuring out what it doesn't ask for as much as figuring out what it does.

So...

First, picture the wheel as rotating clockwise and slipping on the ground. It will eventually roll to the right.

There is a force that acts on the wheel and, at the center of the wheel we have F=M*a. That same force must oppose the slippage via torque. So, F*R=-I*alpha. alpha is the angular acceleration. (The negative sign is important, by the way.)

The above tells us that M*a*R=-.5*M*R2*alpha.

Cancelling M and R we get a=-.5*R*alpha.

Here we have two accelerations, linear and angular. Integrate them both from 0 to T where T is the time when the wheel starts rolling. Then you get:

Vf-Vi =-.5*R*(wf-wi)

where the subscripts f and i stand for initial and final. Now, Vi=0. Furthermore, "rolls without slipping" says that vf =R*wf.

Now you have
Vf=-.5*Vf+.5*R*wi

If you solve this, you find Vf=R*wi/3.

What threw me here was that the problem does not ask for or tell you about anything involving mass or time or friction and, while these do show up in the steps, they cancel each other out in the end. I was using a lot of machinery for what was, in the end, some fairly simple algebra.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K