How Long Would an Electron Take to Spiral into the Nucleus?

  • Thread starter Thread starter WolfOfTheSteps
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electron Orbit
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Start your own thread to ask a follow-up.
9 replies · 5K views
WolfOfTheSteps
Messages
134
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Since an electron on a circular orbit around a proton has a centripetal acceleration, it should radiate energy according to the Larmor relation

[tex]\frac{dE}{dt} = -2/3(q^2/4\pi\epsilon_o)(a^2/c^3)[/tex]

where [itex]q, a, \epsilon_o[/itex] and [itex]c[/itex] are respectively the electron charge, its acceleration, the vacuum permittivity and the velocity of light in a vacuum. Therefore, in classical, mechanics, it should spiral and crash on the nucleus. How long would this decay take, supposing that the size of the initial orbit is 10[itex]^{-10}[/itex]m and the nucleus is a point charge (radius=0)?

Homework Equations



[tex]a = \frac{F_{coulombic}}{m} = \frac{v^2}{r_n} = \frac{1}{m} \frac{q^2}{4 \pi \epsilon_o r^2_n}[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution



I can easily do this if I calculate the centripetal acceleration, [itex]a[/itex], out at 10[itex]^{-10}[/itex]m, and treat it as constant in the Larmor relation.

My question is, do you think this is what the problem wants me to do? Or do you think I have to set up an integral somewhere to vary the acceleration with the distance from the nucleus?

I tried getting a function [itex]a(r)[/itex] by integrating [itex]a[/itex] with respect to [itex]r[/itex] from [itex]r=0[/itex] to [itex]r=10^{-10}[/itex]m, but then I realized that the integral would be infinite, since [itex]r[/itex] is in the denominator. Which makes me think they want me to treat [itex]a[/itex] as a constant.

Any ideas or thoughts?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
My last paragraph was really stupid. a is already a function of r. I did try to find the average acceleration by integrating from 0 to r and dividing by r. But of course the integral is infinite, and that's the problem.
 
Try this: First express E as a function of radius. Then take the derivative with respect to time and set it equal to the Larmor formula; integrate to find time.
 
Awesome! That definitely makes sense, and I wish I would have thought of it!

Thanks, Doc Al.
 
Doc Al said:
Try this: First express E as a function of radius. Then take the derivative with respect to time and set it equal to the Larmor formula; integrate to find time.

Doc Al,

But if you have E as a function of radius, and you differentiate with respect to time, you get 0, since there is no t in that function. Is this what you intended?
 
Wolf of the Ste said:
Doc Al,

But if you have E as a function of radius, and you differentiate with respect to time, you get 0, since there is no t in that function. Is this what you intended?

Your speed "v" is an implicit function of time, and r is a function of time as well.
 
Perhaps it would be helpful to note that;

[tex]v = \frac{ds}{dt} = 2\pi\cdot\frac{dr}{dt}[/tex]

Edit: Dammit patrick
 
Is this the idea?

[tex] <br /> \textnormal{Let A, B, and C be the product of the constants in the functions E, a, and dE/dt respectively. Then,} \\[/tex]

[tex] E = \frac{-A}{r} \ \textnormal{(1)}\\[/tex]

[tex] a = \frac{B}{r^2} \ \textnormal{(2)}\\[/tex]

[tex] \frac{dE}{dt} = C a^2 = \frac{C B^2}{r^4}\ \textnormal{(3)} \ \textnormal{(Lamar Relation)} \\[/tex]

[tex] \textnormal{Then, using (1)}, \\[/tex]

[tex] \frac{dE}{dt} = \frac{A}{r^2} \frac{dr}{dt} \textnormal{(4)} \\[/tex]

[tex] \textnormal{Setting (3) and (4) equal, we get:} \\[/tex]

[tex] \frac{A}{r^2} \frac{dr}{dt} = \frac{C B^2}{r^4} \\[/tex]

[tex] A r^2 dr = C B^2 dt \\[/tex]

[tex] \int{A r^2}dr = \int{C B^2}dt \\[/tex]

[tex] \frac{A}{3} r^3 = C B^2 t \\[/tex]

[tex] t = \frac{A r^3}{3C B^2} \\[/tex]So is this a valid expression for time t needed for the electron to crash into the point nucleus, given an initial distance, r, from the point nucleus??

Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Wolf of the Ste said:
Doc Al,

But if you have E as a function of radius, and you differentiate with respect to time, you get 0, since there is no t in that function. Is this what you intended?
Since the electron is crashing into the nucleus, r must be a function of time and thus E is a function of time (as noted by nrqed and Hoot). If
[tex]E = E(r)[/tex]

Then
[tex]dE/dt = E'(r) dr/dt[/tex]

Start by finding E(r) explicitly, where E is the total energy. (Use the Bohr model.)


Wolf of the Ste said:
Is this the idea?

...
Exactly!