dipungal
- 4
- 0
The title says all I'm asking. Thank you.
The discussion revolves around estimating the number of bacteria that the Earth can support, exploring various approaches and assumptions related to biomass and bacterial distribution in different environments.
Participants express uncertainty regarding the total number of bacteria on Earth, with no consensus reached on a specific estimate or methodology. Multiple views on the significance of different environments for bacterial populations are presented.
Limitations include the reliance on assumptions about biomass distribution and the definitions of what constitutes bacterial life. The calculations presented are based on speculative analogies and may not reflect accurate scientific measurements.
jim mcnamara said:I should also mention that some of your biomass is bacteria, e.g., about 10% of the volume of your colon is bacteria and other primitive organisms.
wikipedia said:The human body, consisting of about 100 trillion cells, carries about ten times as many microorganisms in the intestines. The metabolic activities performed by these bacteria resemble those of an organ, leading some to liken gut bacteria to a "forgotten" organ. It is estimated that these gut flora have around 100 times as many genes in aggregate as there are in the human genome.
dipungal said:The title says all I'm asking. Thank you.
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/1998/08/980825080732.htmWhen people think of bacteria, they likely first consider the nasty ones that cause disease, but the bacteria inside all animals combined -- including humans -- makes up less than one percent of the total amount. By far the greatest numbers are in the subsurface, soil and oceans.