How many dimensions are needed to fully describe the electromagnetic force?

  • Thread starter Thread starter PatrickPowers
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dimensions Em
Click For Summary
Maxwell's equations are fundamentally based in four dimensions, which are sufficient to describe the electromagnetic force in many contexts, including the Lorentz force. However, for a complete description of electromagnetic phenomena, particularly when considering factors like polarization and twist, additional dimensions may be necessary. The discussion highlights that while four dimensions are typically adequate, specific scenarios with greater complexity might require higher-dimensional frameworks, such as those found in Stuckelberg theory, which operates in an eight-dimensional phase space. The size of matrices and the degrees of freedom involved depend on the specific aspects of electromagnetism being analyzed. Ultimately, the dimensionality needed varies based on the complexity of the electromagnetic interactions being considered.
PatrickPowers
Messages
237
Reaction score
1
Maxwell's equations use four dimensions. But wouldn't we need more dimensions to completely describe the EM force. I'm thinking of polarization and twist. So how many mathematical dimensions are necessary for a complete description? That is, how big do the matrices need to be and how many degrees of freedom do they have.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The electromagnetic field is a massless vector field, which means that the free field has two independent physically relevant field degrees of freedom. Of course, spacetime has four dimensions. One could think about fields in higher spacetime dimensions, i.e., look for the unitary representations of the Poincare group in more than four dimensions.
 
I'm thinking of polarization and twist.
... are not twist and polarization included in Maxwell's equations? Look how they come about!

Of course, you can represent anything you like in as many dimensions as you like.
Depends what you want to do with it.

@vanhees71: I was kinda interpreting the question to be asking about the minimum number of dimensions needed to completely describe all of E-Mag. I still think that's 4 - though it is possible to do it in any number like you say.

We can also do it in less for specific situations with a lot of symmetry.
 
PatrickPowers said:
Maxwell's equations use four dimensions. But wouldn't we need more dimensions to completely describe the EM force. I'm thinking of polarization and twist. So how many mathematical dimensions are necessary for a complete description? That is, how big do the matrices need to be and how many degrees of freedom do they have.

It depends what you mean by «EM force«. If you mean the old Lorenz force, then 4D are enough. If you mean more general forces (e.g. the internal force in a two-body covariant system) then you must go beyond Maxwell and special relativity. For instance the EM forces in Stuckelberg theory are defined in a 8N dimensional phase space. For a two-body system, the force is a function in 16 dimensions.
 
Thread 'What is the pressure of trapped air inside this tube?'
As you can see from the picture, i have an uneven U-shaped tube, sealed at the short end. I fill the tube with water and i seal it. So the short side is filled with water and the long side ends up containg water and trapped air. Now the tube is sealed on both sides and i turn it in such a way that the traped air moves at the short side. Are my claims about pressure in senarios A & B correct? What is the pressure for all points in senario C? (My question is basically coming from watching...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
4K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K