A massless spin 1 particle has 2 degrees of freedom. However, we usually describe it using four-vectors, which have four components. Hence, somehow we must get rid of the superfluous degrees of freedom. This job is done by the Maxwell equations. To quote from Gilmore's(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); "Lie Groups, Physics, and Geometry"

“In some sense, Maxwell's equations were a historical accident. Had the discovery of quantum mechanics preceded the unification of electricity and magnetism, Maxwell's equations might not have loomed so large in the history physics. … Since the quantum description has only two independent components associated with each four momentum, there are four dimensions worth of linear combinations of the classical field components that do not describe physically allowed states, for each four momentum. Some mechanism must be derived for annihilating these superpositions. This mechanism is the set of equations discovered by Maxwell. In this sense, Maxwell's equations are an expression of our ignorance.”

Is there an analogous interpretation for the Dirac equation and possibly other equations of motion?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# A Do the equations of motion simply tell us which degrees of freedom apply?

Have something to add?

Draft saved
Draft deleted

Loading...

Similar Threads for equations motion simply |
---|

A Positive and negative plane wave solutions of Dirac equation |

A Transformation of solutions of the Dirac equation |

A Transformation of Dirac spinors |

B Proton emission equation |

B How many equations is the standard model composed of |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**