How Much Force Is Needed to Topple a Frame on Castors?

  • Thread starter Thread starter D19A99G
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Frame Toppling
AI Thread Summary
To determine the force needed to topple a 175 kg frame with a conveyor, calculations show that pushing on the 16° side requires approximately 380.2 N, while pushing on the 12.5° side requires about 491.8 N. The torque generated by these forces is 377.2 N·m and 487.9 N·m, respectively, when factoring in the height of the center of mass. The discussion also highlights the importance of considering swivel castors, which may become obstructed, affecting stability. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for ensuring safety and preventing industrial accidents.
D19A99G
Messages
4
Reaction score
1
Hello all,
I'm trying to calculate how much force is required to topple over a frame with a conveyor attached to it. I have attached a screenshot of the assembly.
I have the centre of gravity as seen on the screenshot. The two lines to the pivot points show the angle. These are 16 degrees (line length of 1032mm) and 12.5 degrees (line length of 1015mm).
The total mass of the unit is 175kg.

I have seen a couple of methods online such as using kinetic and potential energy or trying to calculate the torque required to push the CoG over the pivot.

I'm struggling with this seemingly simple task! Any input would be appreciated, if anymore information is required let me know.

Thanks,
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot.PNG
    Screenshot.PNG
    20.1 KB · Views: 182
Engineering news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF.
Mass is 175 kg. Vertical force = m·g = 175 * 9.8 = 1715 Newton.
Push on the 16° side, fall towards 12.5° side. 1715 * Tan( 12.5°) = 380.2 N
Push on the 12.5° side, fall towards 16° side. 1715 * Tan( 16.0°) = 491.8 N

Edit: The force is assumed to be applied to the centre of mass.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes D19A99G and dlgoff
Height of the centre of mass is; 1.015 m * Cos( 12.5° ) = 0.992 m
Check height of centre of mass; 1.032 m * Cos( 16.0° ) = 0.992 m

Push on the 16° side, fall towards 12.5° side. 1715 * Tan( 12.5°) = 380.2 N.
Which represents a torque of 380.2 N * 0.992 m = 377.2 N·m.
If the force is applied at height of h metre, the force in Newtons will be; F = 377.2 / h Newton.

Push on the 12.5° side, fall towards 16° side. 1715 * Tan( 16.0°) = 491.8 N.
Which represents a torque of; 491.8 N * 0.992 m = 487.9 N·m.
If the force is applied at height of h metre, the force will be; F = 487.9 / h Newton.
 
Thank you for the response!
How would the swivel castors then be factored into that? Is there any easy way?
 
One failure is one industrial accident too many. The easiest way to factor in the swivel castors is to assume the castor will sometimes be blocked from turning or rolling by a small object on the floor. That happens more often than you might expect.
 
Posted June 2024 - 15 years after starting this class. I have learned a whole lot. To get to the short course on making your stock car, late model, hobby stock E-mod handle, look at the index below. Read all posts on Roll Center, Jacking effect and Why does car drive straight to the wall when I gas it? Also read You really have two race cars. This will cover 90% of problems you have. Simply put, the car pushes going in and is loose coming out. You do not have enuff downforce on the right...
I'm trying to decide what size and type of galvanized steel I need for 2 cantilever extensions. The cantilever is 5 ft. The space between the two cantilever arms is a 17 ft Gap the center 7 ft of the 17 ft Gap we'll need to Bear approximately 17,000 lb spread evenly from the front of the cantilever to the back of the cantilever over 5 ft. I will put support beams across these cantilever arms to support the load evenly
Thread 'What's the most likely cause for this carbon seal crack?'
We have a molded carbon graphite seal that is used in an inline axial piston, variable displacement hydraulic pump. One of our customers reported that, when using the “A” parts in the past, they only needed to replace them due to normal wear. However, after switching to our parts, the replacement cycle seems to be much shorter due to “broken” or “cracked” failures. This issue was identified after hydraulic fluid leakage was observed. According to their records, the same problem has occurred...
Back
Top