How much is the ideal rocket equation affected by air drag?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the impact of air drag on the ideal rocket equation, exploring how real-world factors affect rocket performance. Participants examine the theoretical aspects of the equation and its limitations in practical applications, considering various conditions such as atmospheric density and rocket design.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note that the ideal rocket equation does not account for atmospheric drag, which is significant in real-world scenarios.
  • Others argue that drag is influenced by the size and shape of the rocket, with larger and flatter designs experiencing more drag.
  • It is mentioned that the altitude of the rocket affects drag, as thinner air at higher altitudes results in less drag.
  • One participant suggests that the speed of the rocket also plays a role, as the relationship between speed and drag is complex due to air compressibility.
  • Some propose using numerical simulations to incorporate air drag and gravity into calculations, indicating that the ideal rocket equation primarily addresses gravitational effects.
  • A participant clarifies that while gravity can be integrated into the ideal rocket equation, it is fundamentally a separate consideration from drag.
  • Another participant discusses the complexity of full simulations, which must account for factors like Earth's rotation, varying thrust, and changing drag as the rocket approaches the speed of sound.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that air drag is a significant factor affecting rocket performance, but there is no consensus on how to best incorporate it into calculations or the implications for the ideal rocket equation.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the limitations of the ideal rocket equation in practical applications, particularly regarding the assumptions made about drag and gravity. There are unresolved aspects related to the complexity of modeling these forces accurately.

Physics news on Phys.org
that's why it's called the ideal rocket equation...Drag is a tremendous factor in real applications.
 
Depends on:
size and shape of the rocket (obviously, bigger and flatter have more drag)
where in the atmosphere (higher up, thinner air, less drag)
how fast the rocket is moving (non-trivial function due to compressibility of the air)

see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drag_(physics )
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Well, how to calculate?
 
With a numerical simulation.
In addition to air drag, you have to consider gravity as well.
 
mfb said:
With a numerical simulation.
In addition to air drag, you have to consider gravity as well.

er, actually the ideal rocket equation is entirely about gravity...
 
There is no gravity in the ideal rocket equation.
There is a way to re-write the equation to get the gravitational acceleration on Earth into it, but that is just a unit conversion. In a similar way, the distance to moon does not depend on the length of my monitor, but I can express it as multiple of that length if I like.
 
\textbf F = \textbf F_{gravity} + \textbf F_{thrust} + \textbf F_{drag}

Depends how complicated you want to get. For a full simulation, you have to start with the rotation of the Earth at the launch site, and use this as the rocket's initial motion. Gravity drops off slowly ({1\over r^{2}}), thrust increases slightly as the atmospheric pressure is no longer "bottling it up", and drag peaks and falls off as the rocket reaches the speed of sound, which varies with air temperature.

You can simplify a lot of that - flat, non-rotating Earth, constant thrust, drag as some simple, approximate function - but there is still no simple equation to say, "after 30 seconds, the rocket has velocity v at altitude h." Rocket science...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K