How much of a hydrogen atom's mass is due to the mass of fundamental particles?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The mass of a hydrogen atom (1H) is primarily derived from the energy associated with its fundamental particles and the forces acting between them. Specifically, the total mass is 938.738 MeV/c², with the mass of the fundamental particles (1 electron and 3 quarks) contributing only 9.9 MeV/c², which is 1% of the total mass. The remaining 99% (928.9 MeV/c²) is attributed to the strong force and other field energies. The discussion highlights the conversion of energy forms, emphasizing the distinction between rest mass and kinetic energy.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of fundamental particles: electrons and quarks
  • Knowledge of energy-mass equivalence (E=mc²)
  • Familiarity with quantum field theory concepts
  • Basic principles of particle interactions and forces
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the role of gluons in mass and energy contributions in quantum chromodynamics
  • Explore the implications of energy-mass equivalence in particle physics
  • Study the concept of potential energy in bound states of particles
  • Investigate the effects of energy transformations in closed systems, such as the box with perfect mirrors
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of quantum mechanics, and anyone interested in the fundamental principles of mass-energy relationships and particle interactions.

Runner 1
Messages
100
Reaction score
0
If one were to subtract the kinetic energies of all fundamental particles within hydrogen, as well as all of the potential energy of all bound states between these particles, how much mass (as a percentage of the total) would remain? Ignore the kinetic energy due to the hydrogen's speed.And while I'm at it, isn't it weird that fundamental particles can be converted into the motion of another particle? For instance, an electron can be annihilated with a positron, producing photons which can in turn be absorbed by the electrons in another atom, promoting them to a higher state. In effect, one electron has been turned into the motion of a different electron!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A 1H atom (938.738 MeV/c²) is composed of 1 electron (0.510999 MeV/c²) 2 up quarks (2.2 MeV/c²) and 1 down quark (5.0 MeV/c²). So the mass of all of the fundamental particles is 9.9 MeV/c² (1% of total) and the remaining 928.9 MeV/c² (99% of total) is contained in the fields etc (predominantly the strong force).
 
Doesn't it kind of depend on where you draw the line between field and particle? For example if you considered gluons to be component particles then the total would be higher then 1%.
 
Yes, I was drawing the line between fermions and bosons. Since the OP specifically mentioned the PE of the bound states I figured that was the line he wanted drawn.
 
Okay, thanks for the reply! That's very interesting.
 
Runner 1 said:
And while I'm at it, isn't it weird that fundamental particles can be converted into the motion of another particle? For instance, an electron can be annihilated with a positron, producing photons which can in turn be absorbed by the electrons in another atom, promoting them to a higher state. In effect, one electron has been turned into the motion of a different electron!

It's simply the conversion of energy between different forms: rest-energy E_0 = m_0 c^2 (where m_0 is rest-mass) on the one hand and kinetic energy on the other.
 
jtbell said:
It's simply the conversion of energy between different forms: rest-energy E_0 = m_0 c^2 (where m_0 is rest-mass) on the one hand and kinetic energy on the other.

Yeah, I still think it's weird haha.
 
Interesting.

So when the sun shines on me, I am experiencing 100% energy, but when I hoist a glass of water, I am not hoisting 100% mass.

Wonder what 100% mass mass (if you catch my drift) would be like?
 
Haha not really. Energy is basically a numerical value that can be calculated from a system that is conserved through time despite any transformations of the system.

If you shine light into a box with perfect mirrors and weigh the box, it will weigh more than if you weighed just the box alone.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K