Particle acceleration and eV's question from a newbie

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter kenw232
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Acceleration Particle
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concepts of particle acceleration and electron volts (eV), particularly in the context of ionizing hydrogen atoms and the energy levels required for particle collisions in accelerators. Participants explore the relationship between eV measurements and the energies involved in various particle physics scenarios.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant states that 3.4 eV is required to ionize a hydrogen atom from the N=2 state and questions if this energy is relevant for large particle accelerators like the LHC.
  • Another participant explains that an electron volt is a unit of energy, clarifying that 7 TeV corresponds to the energy of an electron in a potential of 7 trillion volts, and discusses the convenience of using eV in particle physics.
  • It is noted that any charged particle can be accelerated in a particle accelerator, and the amount of acceleration is proportional to the charge state.
  • One participant emphasizes that while 3.4 eV is needed to ionize hydrogen, much higher energies (from a few eV to TeV) are required for particle collisions depending on the physics being investigated.
  • A later reply corrects the initial claim about the energy needed for ionization, stating that the ground state hydrogen requires 13.6 eV and that this energy is negligible compared to the energies used for acceleration in particle physics.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the energy levels required for ionization and subsequent particle acceleration, with some clarifying and correcting earlier claims. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the exact energy requirements for various scenarios.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations regarding the assumptions made about energy levels and the complexity of ionization for different states of hydrogen. The discussion also highlights the dependence on definitions of energy units and the context in which they are applied.

kenw232
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
I have a general question on particle acceleration and eV's. Apparently the amount of electron Volts required to ionize a hydrogen atom (that is, remove the electron from the proton), is 3.4 eV (When N = 2, the energy level is -13.6 eV / 2^2 = -3.4 eV). if initially the atom is in the state N = 2? (Remember that N = 1 if the atom is in the lowest energy level.. Source: https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20080710121847AA33ZKz

Once the proton is isolated I can fire it into a particle accelerator correct? And this 3.4eV is generally what is talked about for energy levels for large accelerators correct? Like the LHC can reach 7TeV. What particles then would require that much energy to be stripped? I'm confused exactly what the eV measurement means for particle accelerators. If I just wanted to create a proton, speed it up, and collide it with something what energy level would I be looking at? Just the 3.4eV roughly?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There's a few ideas mixed in together here.

An electron volt is an energy unit - one electron Volt is the amount of energy that an electron has in a potential of one Volt. Thus, 7 TeV is equivalent to the energy of one electron in a potential of 7*10^12 Volts. It's very useful in particle/nuclear/atomic physics experiments, because it's easy to figure out that if I want a 1 MeV proton, I'd better make an electric potential of a million volts, or if I want a 1 MeV carbon beam, I can use one million volts if I get rid of 1 electron, or 500 KV if I get rid of two. And so on.

The "size" of the numbers are also convenient. I know that atomic physics works on meV - eV, and nuclear physics works on keV - MeV scales, and Particle physics on GeV-TeV. It's just another energy unit, but Joules aren't as useful in this context, but neither are eV if I'm talking about the energy I get from food.

kenw232 said:
Once the proton is isolated I can fire it into a particle accelerator correct?
You can accelerate any charged particle. Some accelerators work with injecting positive ions, some work with injecting negative ions. It doesn't matter too much, as long as it's charged. The amount of acceleration is proportional to the charge state, as I mentioned above.

kenw232 said:
Like the LHC can reach 7TeV. What particles then would require that much energy to be stripped?
The eV is just a measure of energy. So you can use it to measure the amount of energy required to strip an electron from hydrogen, or you can use it to measure the kinetic energy of a beam in a particle accelerator. So, protons in the LHC have been accelerated through an equivalent potential of 7TeV. (NB: This isn't a static potential in the LHC, but a RF field, but that's a bit beyond this conversation).

kenw232 said:
f I just wanted to create a proton, speed it up, and collide it with something what energy level would I be looking at? Just the 3.4eV roughly?
You require 3.4 eV just to make an ion. When you do particle collisions, you require enough energy for the ions to interact. Depending on the kind of physics you want to probe, this is anything from a few eV (atomic physics) through to TeV (particle physics) - the "smaller" the thing you want to look at, the more energy you need.
 
Thanks for the help.
 
Ground state hydrogen does not have electrons in the N=2 state, so you need more energy - 13.6 V for a single hydrogen atom, for a hydrogen molecule it is a bit more complicated. Compared to the energy used for acceleration afterwards, that value is negligible. You need the TeV energy to produce new, heavy particles (much heavier than the proton).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
15K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
4K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
889
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
5K