How much power do you need to hover? (human powered helicopter)

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Lsos
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Helicopter Power
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the power requirements for hovering in human-powered helicopters. It is established that a sufficiently large propeller can enable hovering with minimal power, but practical limitations exist due to physics and material constraints. The average power needed for a successful Sikorsky Prize flight is approximately 550 Watts for an 80 kg pilot, with notable examples like Todd Reichert achieving 772 Watts in short bursts. Additionally, the conversation highlights the differences in hovering capabilities between birds and human-powered devices, emphasizing that true hovering is rare and energy-intensive.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of aerodynamics, specifically lift and drag ratios.
  • Familiarity with human-powered flight mechanics.
  • Knowledge of the Sikorsky Prize requirements and specifications.
  • Basic principles of energy expenditure in flight, particularly in birds.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the aerodynamics of large propellers and their efficiency in hovering.
  • Explore the design and engineering principles behind human-powered helicopters.
  • Study the physiological adaptations of birds, particularly hummingbirds, for sustained hovering.
  • Investigate the historical context and advancements related to the Sikorsky Prize in human-powered flight.
USEFUL FOR

Aeronautical engineers, aviation enthusiasts, and researchers in biomechanics and ornithology will benefit from this discussion, particularly those interested in the challenges of human-powered flight and the mechanics of hovering.

Lsos
Messages
803
Reaction score
9
This question, or some form thereof, has come up a lot in this forum.

The answer is that if you can have a propeller big enough, you can hover with almost zero power. But you can only build so big before physics and material limitations get in the way...

These guys didn't seem to give a hoot :thumbup:

I thought this was pretty cool:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-23293676
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Lsos said:
This question, or some form thereof, has come up a lot in this forum.

The answer is that if you can have a propeller big enough, you can hover with almost zero power. But you can only build so big before physics and material limitations get in the way...

These guys didn't seem to give a hoot :thumbup:

I thought this was pretty cool:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-23293676

This thread from the PF may be of help: https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=338502

It's quite long, so start reading at the last page.
 
Lsos said:
This question, or some form thereof, has come up a lot in this forum.

The answer is that if you can have a propeller big enough, you can hover with almost zero power. But you can only build so big before physics and material limitations get in the way...

These guys didn't seem to give a hoot :thumbup:

I thought this was pretty cool:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-23293676

You need to take drag into account here. Lift / Drag ratio will never be infinite and a long rotor blade will introduce high drag - imposing a fundamental power requirement. It's no surprise that the only animals that can truly hover are very small. At that scale, the electric forces start to be more relevant than g forces.
 
sophiecentaur said:
It's no surprise that the only animals that can truly hover are very small.
Kites are about the same size as a pigeon or dove, and they can hover. I see them quite often a local site for radio control gliders. Link to a video of a kite (not mine):

 
Last edited by a moderator:
rcgldr said:
Kites are about the same size as a pigeon or dove, and they can hover. I see them quite often a local site for radio control gliders. Link to a video of a kite (not mine):



It seems as if it's trying to go against the wind and it's not trully hovering. I've seen the same with many different birds.
I think the only bird that can really hover is the hummingbird.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Yes, they use the wind and up-draughts to keep up. Kestrels are masters of this and can stay stationary for minutes on end but that's not a true hover.
As you say, a hummingbird is the only real 'hoverrer'. But birds have a totally different respiration system because of the incredible cost in Energy of the immense demanded for flight with large animals. I looked up the respiratory system for birds, once, and found that they work in a very different way - just to shift the necessary volume of gases through. Hummingbirds, of course, use pretty high grade fuel - nectar (four star unleaded quality!)

I heard David Attenborough making the point that, as soon as they find themselves isolated from big predators (on an evolutionary timescale, that is) large birds soon develop a flightless lifestyle because the energy demand drops significantly if you just walk around on a safe island!
 
rcgldr said:
Kites are about the same size as a pigeon or dove, and they can hover. I see them quite often a local site for radio control gliders.

Aero_UoP said:
It seems as if it's trying to go against the wind and it's not trully hovering.
There's not much wind in that particular video, and no real source for an updraft. I've seen them hover on windless days. Wiki article for species group:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elanid_kite

more articles:

http://www.birdinginformation.com/birds/falcons-and-kites/white-tailed-kite

http://www.bird-friends.com/BirdPage.php?name=White-Tailed Kite

Another video:

http://ibc.lynxeds.com/video/white-tailed-kite-elanus-leucurus/adult-hovering

Ospreys are bigger still and can hover (over water since they hunt fish), but I don't know if they can hover on windless days.
 
  • #10
I'm not particularly interested in ornithology but thanks anyway ;)
 
  • #11
Getting back to Berkeman's post, in the other thread, there's a video of a 4 rotor human powered helicopter that does quite well, but the rotors are still operating in ground effect. I'm not aware of any human powered helicopter that doesn't involve ground effect, although with the model shown in the other thread, it might be possible to get that model out of ground effect for a brief moment if that model could be tested in a much larger building.
 
  • #12
Lsos said:
These guys didn't seem to give a hoot

From their website: http://www.aerovelo.com/projects/helicopter/tech-info/

The average power required for a 1 minute Sikorsky Prize flight is currently estimated at 550 Watts for an 80 kg pilot like Todd. The figure below shows the power output of the average fit male, alongside that of cycling legend Eddy Mercks, and two recent laboratory ergometer tests from Todd Reichert. All of Todd’s is training is focused on efforts of 5 minutes or less, which is why his numbers exceed that of Merckx who was typically more of an endurance athlete. At 772 Watts for 1 minute, our pilot’s power output exceeds the power requirements of the helicopter by a safe margin.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #13
rcgldr said:
Kites are about the same size as a pigeon or dove, and they can hover. I see them quite often a local site for radio control gliders. Link to a video of a kite (not mine):



Any site that is suitable for r/c gliders is going to have a useful amount of lift to keep totally un-powered models in the air so that evidence is not very conclusive, surely.
And the video has loads of wind noise on the microphone, too! Plus the tree is shaking a fair bit.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #14
sophiecentaur said:
Any site that is suitable for r/c gliders is going to have a useful amount of lift to keep totally un-powered models in the air so that evidence is not very conclusive, surely. And the video has loads of wind noise on the microphone, too! Plus the tree is shaking a fair bit.
At the site I was referring to, when there is no wind, the people there fly electric powered models. When there is wind, it's about 60% powered / 40% gliders, depending on the group.

As far as the kites behave versus the wind, if there's a headwind and updraft, they mostly soar with little flapping. If there's a headwind and no updraft they flap a bit more. If there's no wind, then they are flapping quite rapidly, with full swing flaps. Regardless of the wind, when "hovering", they're virtually motionless with respect to the ground (relying on vision to track a spot on the ground), which is quite impressive.

The other video I posted showed a kite hovering close to the ground (2nd part of video), where there can't be much wind, due to the small shrubs, and what wind there is appears to be blowing from behind the kite. Link to that video:

http://ibc.lynxeds.com/video/white-tailed-kite-elanus-leucurus/adult-hovering
 
Last edited:
  • #15
There's little point in this conversation because I think we are talking at cross purposes and we are only differing in 'degree' and not in principle. Any video you post can't be real evidence because there are no measurements of actual wind speed (particularly not where the bird is hovering). Kites, Eagles Buzzards etc. etc, will soar on invisible thermals on a totally 'calm' day, getting their energy from the Sun. Of course, most birds can hover for a short while, particularly when they can use ground effect. It often goes with the process of landing and taking off. The point is that it is very seldom 'sustained' hovering, because it is so costly. If it were, in fact, no trouble for birds to hover then they would be doing it much more often and they would not bother to face into the wind, run, leap off cliffs etc.. They would just VTOL.

The only convincing evidence that kites actually hover in static air would be a video of two kites facing each other and hovering for a significant length of time - showing that their air speed is zero. Hummingbirds can often be seen, clustered around flowers, facing in all directions - supping their high energy drink. I would say that was good evidence about hummingbirds.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 69 ·
3
Replies
69
Views
16K
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
7K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
7K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
12K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
15K