How Small Can Mirrors Reflect in Recursive Reflection?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter -Job-
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mirrors
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on the concept of recursive reflection between two mirrors and the limitations of image recognition at microscopic scales. Participants assert that as one zooms into a mirror, the image quality degrades significantly, ultimately becoming unrecognizable due to resolution loss and field of view constraints. The conversation highlights the principles of optical resonators, specifically the Fabry-Perot configuration, and its application in gas lasers like Ar-Ne and CO2, emphasizing that only specific frequencies can be amplified within such systems.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of optical principles, specifically recursive reflection.
  • Familiarity with Fabry-Perot optical resonators.
  • Knowledge of gas laser operation, particularly Ar-Ne and CO2 lasers.
  • Basic concepts of light wavelength and frequency.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of Fabry-Perot interferometry.
  • Explore the mechanics of gas lasers, focusing on Ar-Ne and CO2 types.
  • Investigate the effects of light wavelength on image resolution in optical systems.
  • Learn about semi-silvered mirrors and their applications in optical experiments.
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, optical engineers, and anyone interested in the principles of light reflection and laser technology.

-Job-
Science Advisor
Messages
1,152
Reaction score
4
If we have two mirrors, each one facing the other (producing what i'll describe as recursive reflection) then, supposing we could zoom into one of the mirrors as much as we'd like, then at what point would the image become unrecognizable. Would there be a microscopical-sized reflection of the other mirror? How small can/does it get?
 
Science news on Phys.org
Depending on how we choose to look at light, it would be as small as the wavelength of light
 
Mattara said:
Depending on how we choose to look at light, it would be as small as the wavelength of light

I disagree.
There is no way that a single spot as small as a wavelenghth of light could contain an entire picture of its reflective ancestory under that condition.
Most likely, there would be a serious degredation of resoultion or field of view, or both.
 
Uh, you'd wouildn't get recursion if you zoomed in. You'd get a close-up image of the device, camera or head of whom/what-ever is doing the viewing.

So there's only two ways this could be set up:
-if your view angle was oblique, but that means eventually, your light path will slip off the side of the mirror and you'll simply be viewing a really zoomed in image of the laboratory wall.
- you put the reflective surface *in front* of your viewer. Which means you use a semi-silvered mirror, which means every bounce of the light loses brightness, which means after a few bounces, there's no light left to get through.

I am not sure your experiment is possible even in principle.
 
Last edited:
If put two mirrors parallel (at about .5 meter) you have a Fabry-Perot optical resonator. If the distance is less (about .5 cm) you may have a filter.

This device has its own proper frequencies so if one of them is not all reflecting (such as 99% of reflecting) the radiation only emerges from the cave if its frequency is equal (approx.) to one of the proper frequencies of the resonator.

The common use is in gas laser such as Ar-Ne or CO2. You put an amplification media inside the cave, and if the maximum of gain is very close to one of the proper frecuencies of the cave (in other case the radiation will not be amplified) then, the radiation emerges amplified and you have a cool laser€ :D
 
At a separation near the wavelength of the initial light, I believe that significant tunneling of higher wavelengths and lower amplitude through the mirror (one dimensional box) would occur. I guess that the image resolution of this tunneled radiation to that of the initial image would vary approximately as the squared ratio between initial light frequency and tunneled light frequency.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K