How to Approach Solving Set Theory Equalities

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
1 reply · 2K views
racshot65
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I'm struggling to understand how to approach set theory equality questions for example:

True or false?

(A n B) is a subset of (A u B)


Is quite simple as its obvious the intersection will contain everything that is in the union

But what about a more complex question like ...


True or false

(A u B) n (C u D) = (A n (C u D)) u (B n (C u D))


There must be some method you follow to tackle a question like this as it isn't obvious like the previous question ?


My question is what is the method ?


Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In general, if you have something like this:

Prove: [itex]S_1 = S_2[/itex] then you show that [itex]S_1 \subset S_2[/itex] and [itex]S_2 \subset S_1[/itex]. Then the equality follows. In the above example, you would say, let [itex]x \in (A \cup B) \cap (C \cup D)[/itex] now you have to show that x is an element of the RHS of your equation. Then you "just" do this in the opposite direction. So, you know that [itex]x[/itex] is in either A or B AND it is in either C or D. Now, it should be clear (with a little work) that [itex](A\cup B) \cap (C \cup D) \subset (A \cap (C \cup D)) \cup (B \cap (C \cup D))[/itex]. Now just show the other direction.
 
Last edited: