How to approximate this relation?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter KFC
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Approximate Relation
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on approximating the change in wavelength, Δλ_k, between adjacent modes in a given relation defined by λ_k = (2 n(λ_k) L) / k. The approximation for Δλ_k is established as Δλ_k ≈ (λ_k²) / (2 n_g L), where n_g is derived from the index of reflection and involves a first-order Taylor expansion. The user seeks guidance on how to derive this approximation effectively, particularly through the expansion of n(λ_k) and its derivatives.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of wavelength and mode concepts in optics
  • Familiarity with Taylor series expansions
  • Knowledge of derivatives and their application in physics
  • Basic grasp of the index of refraction and its dependence on wavelength
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of Taylor series in physics, focusing on first-order expansions
  • Research the properties of the index of refraction, specifically in relation to wavelength
  • Explore the derivation of wavelength relations in optical systems
  • Learn about the implications of mode changes in wave mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, optical engineers, and students studying wave mechanics or optics who are looking to deepen their understanding of wavelength approximations and mode analysis.

KFC
Messages
477
Reaction score
4
I got a relation as follow

[tex]\lambda_k = \frac{2 n(\lambda_k) L}{k}[/tex]

where [tex]\lambda_k[/tex] is a wavelength at mode k, k is integer, n is the index of reflection, L is a constant. I am trying to find the change of wavelength between two adjacent mode approximately, the answer will be

[tex]\Delta\lambda_k \approx \frac{\lambda_k^2}{2n_gL}[/tex]

where
[tex]n_g = n(\lambda_k) - \left.\lambda_k\frac{dn}{d\lambda}\right|_{\lambda_k}[/tex]

I have no idea how to achieve this. Please give me some hint. Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't see exactly how to do it right away, but [itex]n_g[/itex] looks an awful lot like a first-order Taylor expansion of n around [itex]\lambda_k[/itex]. So maybe if you rewrite [tex]n(\lambda_k) = \frac{k \lambda_k}{2 L}[/tex]
and then do some expansion of the left hand side for
[tex]n(\lambda_{k + 1}) = n(\lambda_k) + \Delta\lambda_k \frac{dn(\lambda_k)}{d\lambda_k} + \text{ higher order}[/tex].
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K