How to calculate if wind through a funnel can open a check valve?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mw11
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Wind
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the feasibility of using a rotating funnel to capture wind and generate enough pressure to open a check valve. Participants explore the relationship between wind speed, funnel geometry, and the required cracking pressure of the valve, considering various theoretical and practical aspects of fluid dynamics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes a scenario involving wind speed 'W', funnel diameter 'X', and pipe dimensions 'Y' and 'Z', questioning the minimum cracking pressure needed for the check valve.
  • Several participants seek clarification on terms such as "rotating funnel," "cracking pressure," and the nature of the fluid, emphasizing that the discussion is highly dependent on scale.
  • Another participant presents a formula for stagnation pressure, suggesting that it is independent of geometric factors, while acknowledging that flow through the check valve complicates the situation.
  • Concerns are raised about the effectiveness of a funnel shape in capturing air, with one participant expressing confusion over the implications of geometry on pressure dynamics.
  • Some participants argue that the funnel's size may matter once gas starts to flow, while others assert that it is the inlet/outlet area ratio that influences performance.
  • Participants discuss the purpose of injecting air into soil, with one suggesting it is to stimulate aerobic microorganisms, while others question the efficiency of this method.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the impact of funnel geometry on pressure generation and the effectiveness of the proposed design. There is no consensus on the relationship between the funnel's size and the resulting pressure dynamics, nor on the necessity of the check valve in the proposed application.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights various assumptions regarding fluid dynamics, the definitions of terms used, and the specific conditions under which the proposed system would operate. There are unresolved mathematical steps and dependencies on the specific design parameters that participants have not fully explored.

mw11
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
Imagine a wind speed of 'W' (variable), rotating funnel of 'X' diameter that narrows and then conveys flow through a 'Y' diameter, 'Z' length pipe until it hits a 'Y' diameter check valve. What is the minimum cracking pressure needed of the check valve, provided the variables above?
Imagine a wind speed of 'W' (variable), rotating funnel of 'X' diameter that narrows and then conveys flow through a 'Y' diameter, 'Z' length pipe until it hits a 'Y' diameter check valve. What is the minimum cracking pressure needed of the check valve, provided the variables above?

I am hoping to understand the equation that can be used to understand if/how the captured wind could be compressed via a funnel type apparatus against the check valve, and exceed the cracking pressure thus allowing flow to occur.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
What is a rotating funnel? Cracking Pressure? What is the fluid ? Speed regime? Sizes? This depends very much on scale.
 
If the air at the inlet has pressure ##p##, its velocity Mach number is ##M##, and the stagnation pressure - i.e. when the flow is completely stopped by the check valve - is ##p_t##, then the pressure at the check valve is:
$$p_t = p \left(1+\frac{M^2}{5}\right)^{3.5}$$
This is regardless of any geometric factor. (If the airflow hits the bottom of a bucket, it will stop no matter what.)

If there is flow going through the check valve then it gets more complicated - since the flow is not fully stopped - and the static pressure (that keeps the check valve opened) will be lower according to the flow velocity.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Juanda and berkeman
hutchphd said:
What is a rotating funnel? Cracking Pressure? What is the fluid ? Speed regime? Sizes? This depends very much on scale.
The funnel (lets say inlet diameter 18", 20 degree reducing to 2" outlet) spins freely to capture the prevailing wind (fluid is air, wind speeds of 10 - 20 mph). the outlet connects to a one-way check-valve with low (i.e., 0.5 psi) cracking or opening pressure. The question is can the low pressure wind be funneled towards the check valve with enough velocity/pressure to open it?
 
jack action said:
If the air at the inlet has pressure ##p##, its velocity Mach number is ##M##, and the stagnation pressure - i.e. when the flow is completely stopped by the check valve - is ##p_t##, then the pressure at the check valve is:
$$p_t = p \left(1+\frac{M^2}{5}\right)^{3.5}$$
This is regardless of any geometric factor. (If the airflow hits the bottom of a bucket, it will stop no matter what.)

If there is flow going through the check valve then it gets more complicated - since the flow is not fully stopped - and the static pressure (that keeps the check valve opened) will be lower according to the flow velocity.

Hmmm
So having a funnel shape to "capture" more air has no effect? Feels weird. My intuition suggests to me that if the entry of the bucket is bigger than its end (cone-shaped bucket) then the geometry should have some impact but it wouldn't be the first time intuition doesn't take me all the way to the right answer.

Mach number ##M## only changes with the velocity at the entry and the speed of sound in the gas and I guess those are independent of the geometry of the bucket. But it's so weird!

The wiki link shows the derivation for stagnation pressure in the incompressible case (Bernoulli) but for the compressible case, it only tells where the formula comes from. Do you recommend some source to read the derivation? Of course, assuming a closed valve to keep things simple as you said.

I gotta hit the bed but I'll keep my eyes on the thread.
 
mw11 said:
The funnel (lets say inlet diameter 18", 20 degree reducing to 2" outlet) spins freely to capture the prevailing wind (fluid is air, wind speeds of 10 - 20 mph).
Wait, you mean like an anemometer?

1691012417716.png

https://www.thoughtco.com/history-of-the-anemometer-1991222
 
The concept of the anemometer is similar; however, put a funnel on the one end, add a hollow stem, and check valve. If it helps, the objective is to inject air (wind assisted, very low flow) through a check valve (trying to figure out design parameters) and into the soil column.
 
mw11 said:
If it helps, the objective is to inject air (wind assisted, very low flow) through a check valve (trying to figure out design parameters) and into the soil column.
A sketch of your proposed device would help a lot. Thanks. :smile:
 
And pending your sketch, it's sounding like you just want to make a wind-powered air pump. There are simpler and much more efficient ways to do that...
 
  • #10
You very well may be right... however, this is my current scenario.. quick sketch attached!
 

Attachments

  • #11
Before you get too enamored with your idea, I suggest spending some time using search terms check valve pressure drop.

mw11 said:
to understand if/how the captured wind could be compressed via a funnel type apparatus against the check valve, and exceed the cracking pressure thus allowing flow to occur.
Stagnation pressure is stagnation pressure, and no funnel device will increase it.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: russ_watters and berkeman
  • #12
mw11 said:
If it helps, the objective is to inject air (wind assisted, very low flow) through a check valve (trying to figure out design parameters) and into the soil column.
Sorry if I'm a bit slow on this, but why do you want to inject air into the dirt?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Bystander
  • #13
Why do you need a check valve?
If the wind does not blow, there will be no flow.

The air pressure on the soil will be similarly increased upwind of a tree or a wall. Wind pressures are normally extremely low, the flap valve will be very delicate.

Code:
  Speed    Ram
   kph     psi
    10    0.0007
    20    0.0027
    30    0.0062
    40    0.0110
    50    0.0171
    60    0.0247
    70    0.0336
    80    0.0439
    90    0.0555
   100    0.0686
 
  • #14
Juanda said:
Do you recommend some source to read the derivation?
The starting point is actually the derivation of stagnation temperature. The stagnation pressure can then be found with the isentropic relations for an ideal gas.

Basically, the energy contained in the moving fluid is the sum of the fluid enthalpy and its kinetic energy. If the fluid speed is reduced to zero, then the enthalpy must increase accordingly.

Juanda said:
So having a funnel shape to "capture" more air has no effect? Feels weird.
What will happen is that the funnel will basically be filled with air (at stagnation pressure), and the incoming will just spill over.

If you imagine your theory right - The bigger the funnel entrance, the bigger the pressure - it would mean that at some point the pressure would be so high that it would want to exit the funnel, against the wind. So what would happen? The funnel would empty itself until total vacuum is achieved? That wouldn't make sense.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: russ_watters and Juanda
  • #15
To be fair to your intuition:

The funnel size does matter once gas starts to flow. for a given gas flow, a larger funnel/system will operate nearer the stagnation pressure.
 
  • #16
Dullard said:
To be fair to your intuition:

The funnel size does matter once gas starts to flow. for a given gas flow, a larger funnel/system will operate nearer the stagnation pressure.
To be fair, it is not how large a funnel/system is that will determine this, but the inlet/outlet areas ratio.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: russ_watters
  • #17
True. If you ignore 'for a given flow.'
 
  • #18
berkeman said:
Sorry if I'm a bit slow on this, but why do you want to inject air into the dirt?

Bueller? Bueller?

1691095785447.png

https://www.aveleyman.com/FilmCredit.aspx?FilmID=6184

Okay, does anybody else know of a good reason to inject air into dirt? Inquiring minds want to know...
 
  • #20
mw11 said:
Haha. The purpose would be to stimulate/enhance aerobic microorganisms that break down contaminants

Interesting. How do you guide the ##O_2## throughout the soil? Would it be more efficient to just water the soil with oxygenated ##H_2O##?
 
  • #21
mw11 said:
Haha. The purpose would be to stimulate/enhance aerobic microorganisms that break down contaminants
There are farmers who plough their land, and inject the diesel engine exhaust deep into the soil during the process. The CO2, H2O and diesel particulate soot do not cause air pollution, and may actually do some good. There is also excess oxygen in the diesel exhaust, along with some NOx and sulphur from cheap fuel.
http://www.theconsciousfarmer.com/exhaust-emissions/
 
  • Wow
Likes   Reactions: hutchphd and berkeman

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
11K
Replies
6
Views
10K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
14K
  • · Replies 69 ·
3
Replies
69
Views
16K