How to Calculate Mu* for Superconducting Systems Using McMillan Formula?

Click For Summary
To calculate the Coulomb pseudo-potential mu* for superconducting systems using the McMillan formula, the critical temperature Tc can be derived from the equation Tc = thetaD/1.45 {-1.04(1+lambda)/[lambda – mu*(1+ 0.62 lambda)]}. The user has specific values for thetaD, lambda, and the density of states N(Ef) but is unsure about the correct method to determine mu*. It is advised to refer to McMillan's original paper and the work of Morel and Anderson for a more accurate calculation of mu* using the density of states. The discussion highlights the complexity of deriving mu* and the importance of not choosing it arbitrarily. Accurate calculation is essential for determining Tc in superconducting systems.
angel 42
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone, Do you know any equation can help me to calculate the Coulomb pseudo-potential mu*, cause I'm working on McMillan formula
Tc= thetaD/1.45 {-1.04(1+lamda)/[ lamda – mu*(1+ 0.62 lamda)]}

trying to find the critical temperature Tc for a superconducting system I only have three given quantities:
thetaD= 750 K (debye temp)
Lamda= 1.04 (the electron-phonon coupling constant)
N(Ef)= 18.26 state/atom.eV (density of states DOS)
I'm not still sure of this If it's correct or not cause I found many other formulas with different details. offcourse I get this formula from the net, I first choose mu*= 0.1 as most solutions but the prophesier said it's wrong to choose it arbitrarily I have to calculate mu* using the density of state. so I searched the net to find an equation that relates mu* to DOS I found one, but it was very complicated with another unknown quantities like the volume (volume of what, how can I find it from the given numbers and as far as I know the volume of the lattice- assume- couldn't be calculated from them:confused:) It's like self learning of something completely new and never taught before -mybe that's why I couldn't find a way to figure that out. I tried for a week before typing this. I really need to do this please help If anyone can, I appreciate all the help I'll have.

Desperate physicist
:frown:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You might want to check out "Principles of Electron Tunneling Spectroscopy " by E L Wolf
 
I'm sorry it took a while to respond to this. Most of my text (and my journal access) are either at work, or from work, so most of the stuff I needed to refer to to answer this weren't available to me till today (since I am now at work).

The reference to Wolf's tunneling text isn't as useful because he simply stated it (pg. 523) and then gave you a reference to McMillan's paper (unless I missed it elsewhere in the text).

What you need is the original McMillan's paper (Phy. Rev. 167, 331 (1968)). Look at Eq. 13 of that paper, which was derived in another paper by Morel and Anderson (reference given therein). This is where you need to use the info that you have on the DOS.

Zz.
 
I'll see thanks.
 
Thread 'Unexpected irregular reflection signal from a high-finesse cavity'
I am observing an irregular, aperiodic noise pattern in the reflection signal of a high-finesse optical cavity (finesse ≈ 20,000). The cavity is normally operated using a standard Pound–Drever–Hall (PDH) locking configuration, where an EOM provides phase modulation. The signals shown in the attached figures were recorded with the modulation turned off. Under these conditions, when scanning the laser frequency across a cavity resonance, I expected to observe a simple reflection dip. Instead...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
39
Views
6K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
4K