How to calculate mutual inductance of a rectangular loop

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around calculating the mutual inductance of a rectangular loop, particularly in the context of designing a Rogowski coil. Participants explore various theoretical approaches and mathematical formulations related to mutual inductance, magnetic fields, and the implications of different loop shapes.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks assistance in calculating mutual inductance for a rectangular Rogowski coil, contrasting it with the conventional circular design.
  • Another participant references Ampere's law and considers the implications of choosing a rectangular path for integration instead of a circular one.
  • There is a discussion on the relationship between magnetic field strength (H) and the current (Ip), with calculations provided for a specific current value.
  • Participants explore the idea that despite changing the shape of the loop, the mean values of H and B may remain constant under certain conditions.
  • One participant suggests that the integration for a rectangular loop is more complex due to varying distances from the current wire to the coil, unlike the circular case.
  • Another participant proposes that if certain conditions are met (e.g., same length of the big loop, same number of turns), the rectangular loop can be treated similarly to a circular loop for calculations of mutual inductance.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various viewpoints on the calculation methods and implications of different loop shapes, with no clear consensus reached on the best approach to calculate mutual inductance for a rectangular loop.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the complexity of integration may increase with a rectangular loop due to varying distances and dimensions, which are not present in circular loops. The discussion also highlights the need for specific conditions to be met for certain assumptions to hold true.

endiewibowo
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
I am planning to build a rogowski coil but not the conventional one, which is a circular loop.
Below is the example of a rogowski coil so you have the big picture of my question.

CurrentSensor-Rogowski_ill.jpg


In the picture, the current conducting wire (with current Ip) is encircled by a big circular loop rogowski coil. The cross sectional area of the winding itself can be a circle, rectangle, or oval.
For this variations of cross sectional area, I know how to calculate the mutual inductance.

However, what if the shape of the big loop is rectangular? How to calculate the mutual inductance?

I hope you all can help me figure this out.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
endiewibowo said:
However, what if the shape of the big loop is rectangular? How to calculate the mutual inductance?

Think of Amperes law, which in this case could be formulated:

circulation H⋅ds = Ip

( B = μ0*H )

What happens if you choose a rectangle as integration path instead of a circle?
 
Hesch said:
Think of Amperes law, which in this case could be formulated:

circulation H⋅ds = Ip

( B = μ0*H )

What happens if you choose a rectangle as integration path instead of a circle?

Let's see. Suppose I is 1kA.
So:

circulation B⋅ds = Ip0

circulation B⋅ds = 1000 A * 4π*10-7 Vs/Am = 4π*10-4

So then, how is the B ?
 
Last edited:
Forget B for a moment. Let's look at H when Ip = 1000A and radius for the "big loop" = R, according to your drawing in #1:

circulation H⋅ds = 1000A

Now you choose a circulation path through the "small loops", giving:

H = 1000A / (2πR). Here 2πR is the length of the rogowski coil = L ⇒ H = 1000A / L.

Now you bend the the coil into a rectangle, and you choose a circulation path following this rectangular shape. The length of the rogowski coil is still the same = L, you have just bended it. So now Hmean = 1000A / L. This means that

Hmean = H ⇒
Bmean = B ⇒
Vicircle = dψv/dt = Virect. ( Ψv = flux * turns )

According to the definition: Vi = -M × dIp/dt ⇒
Mrect = Mcircle
 
Last edited:
Hesch said:
Forget B for a moment. Let's look at H when Ip = 1000A and radius for the "big loop" = R, according to your drawing in #1:

circulation H⋅ds = 1000A

Now you choose a circulation path through the "small loops", giving:

H = 1000A / (2πR). Here 2πR is the length of the rogowski coil = L ⇒ H = 1000A / L.

Now you bend the the coil into a rectangle, and you choose a circulation path following this rectangular shape. The length of the rogowski coil is still the same = L, you have just bended it. So now Hmean = 1000A / L. This means that

Hmean = H ⇒
Bmean = B ⇒
Vicircle = dψv/dt = Virect. ( Ψv = flux * turns )

According to the definition: Vi = -M × dIp/dt ⇒
Mrect = Mcircle

Okay, let's say Mrect = Mcircle

And suppose the small loop is rectangular as well.
img.png


To calculate M:

c1.png


So:
c2.png


The integration is easy since the distance x from the current wire to the coil is all the same because of circular symmetry of the big loop. However, if the big loop is rectangular, the distance x will be different for each small loop. Also, it will make a and b change all the time as well. So, how to calculate this?
 
Last edited:
endiewibowo said:
The integration is easy since the distance x from the current wire to the coil is all the same because of circular symmetry of the big loop. However, if the big loop is rectangular, the distance x will be different for each small loop. Also, it will make a and b change all the time as well. So, how to calculate this?

You may calculate it using Biot-Savart law, but that is comprehensive.

I think that the idea is to look at: ∫circulation H⋅ds = 1000A. This equation is valid no matter what circulation path you choose. Now say that the distance between two windings in the rogowski coil is very small ( ds ), and the length of the big loop is constant, then the mean value of H will be the same as for rectangular/circular shape of the big loop.

Hmean = constant → Bmean = constant → Ψv = constant → Vi = constant → M = constant. ( Ψv = flux * ( number of windings ) ).

So the idea is to regard the rectangular big loop as a circular loop as you will get the same result in calculations under the conditions:

Same length of the big loop, same number of turns in the rogowski coil, same cross section area of the rogowski coil, the rogowski coil is completely surrounding the conductor (closed loop).
 
Last edited:
Hesch said:
You may calculate it using Biot-Savart law, but that is comprehensive.

I think that the idea is to look at: ∫circulation H⋅ds = 1000A. This equation is valid no matter what circulation path you choose. Now say that the distance between two windings in the rogowski coil is very small ( ds ), and the length of the big loop is constant, then the mean value of H will be the same as for rectangular/circular shape of the big loop.

Hmean = constant → Bmean = constant → Ψv = constant → Vi = constant → M = constant. ( Ψv = flux * ( number of windings ) ).

So the idea is to regard the rectangular big loop as a circular loop as you will get the same result in calculations under the conditions:

Same length of the big loop, same number of turns in the rogowski coil, same cross section area of the rogowski coil, the rogowski coil is completely surrounding the conductor (closed loop).

Okay then. I will try to make both coils and compare the result. Thanks a lot.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
5K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K