How to calculate the capacity of a disk

  • Thread starter Thread starter momentum
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Capacity Disk
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the capacity of a disk, specifically a 2.5 inch diameter disk plate with multiple recording surfaces, sectors, and tracks. Participants explore the relationships between these components and seek clarification on the calculations involved in determining the disk's capacity in gigabytes.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the calculation of usable surfaces from the number of plates, noting that the topmost and bottommost surfaces are not used.
  • Another participant provides a formula for disk capacity, which includes the number of usable surfaces, tracks, sectors, and the size of each sector.
  • Clarification is sought regarding the relationship between sectors and tracks, with one participant explaining that tracks are concentric circles containing discrete sectors.
  • Participants attempt to visualize the concept of sectors and tracks, comparing them to pages and lines in a book.
  • One participant questions the relevance of the physical size of the disk in the context of capacity calculations, while others agree that it does not affect data storage capacity.
  • A participant shares historical context about the evolution of hard disk drives, emphasizing the change in storage capacity and cost over time.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

There is no consensus on the visualization of sectors and tracks, as participants express differing levels of understanding. While some agree on the irrelevance of the physical size of the disk, others continue to seek clarification on the technical aspects of disk capacity calculations.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty regarding the visualization of sectors and tracks, and there are unresolved questions about the relationship between the physical characteristics of the disk and its data storage capacity.

momentum
Messages
111
Reaction score
0
A 2.5 inch diameter disk plate has 6 plates , 512 bytes per sector , 256 sectors , 5268 tracks per surface. What is the capacity of the disk in terms of Giga bytes ?

In the solution of my book ..written:

6 plates = 6x2-2 = 10 recording surfaces // I don't understand this part.

Could you please explain this ?

Ans: 6.43 GB
 
Technology news on Phys.org
The topmost and bottommost surfaces aren't used so for 6 plates you have 12 surfaces which amounts to 10 usable surfaces.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: stoomart
answer given in the book :

Disk capacity = 10x5268x256x512/2^30 = 6.43 GB

what is the relation here in sector and track. ... I see they are multiplied ...I could not get this part
 
The tracks are concentric circles on the surface of the disk, in this case there are 5268 of them.
Each track contains discrete chunks of data, these are the sectors, there are 256 sectors per track in this case.
The sectors each have a capacity of 512 bytes; read or write operations are from or to 1 whole such sector at a time,
(even if only part of the 512 bytes contains relevant data).
 
Last edited:
rootone said:
Each track contains discrete chunks of data, these are the sectors

not clear. Could you please show me an image to visualize this concept ?

Is not sectors looks like arc in circle ? or sectors lay in concentric circle i.e track ? unable to visualize this part.
 
Think of it as a pages in a book.
Each page has a lines, and you can only have so many lines on one page.
and only so many words on one line
 
sectors are like words in your example ? :smile:

and lines are tracks ?

Is that correct understanding ?
 
momentum said:
sectors are like words in your example ? :smile:

and lines are tracks ?

Is that correct understanding ?
More like sentences, but you got the right idea
 
okay ..
momentum said:
A 2.5 inch diameter disk plate

I don't see this being used in solution . Is this a useless information in this problem ?
 
  • #10
Yes, the physical size of the storage medium is not relevant, It only matters what is their capacity to store data.
The earliest hard disk drives were very heavy devices (tens of Kg), they needed to be installed in a whole room by themselves with air cooling,
 
  • #11
rootone said:
Yes, the physical size of the storage medium is not relevant, It only matters what is their capacity to store data.
The earliest hard disk drives were very heavy devices (tens of Kg), they needed to be installed in a whole room by themselves with air cooling,
awesome.

thanks for your time.
 
  • #12
http://royal.pingdom.com/2010/02/18/amazing-facts-and-figures-about-the-evolution-of-hard-disk-drives/

Factoid: A 5 MB hard disk drive from Apple cost $3,500 in 1981. That’s $700,000 per GB.

Inflation adjusted that's almost $2 million per GB.

BoB
 
  • #13
:wink:
 
  • #14
momentum said:
not clear. Could you please show me an image to visualize this concept ?

Is not sectors looks like arc in circle ? or sectors lay in concentric circle i.e track ? unable to visualize this part.
The track is established by the mechanics. Once the read/write heads have been positioned, each head has access to all the information on the track - all 128Kbytes of it.

But 128Kbytes is a pretty large block of storage. To use it efficiently, you want to allow it to be shared among many small files - and you want to be able to write data to one of those files without changing data for the other files. So the track is divided into sectors of a more convenient size. This division is done during disk formatting when special disk instructions are used to write whole tracks with data patterns. Those data patterns are then read during normal read and write operations so that the sectors can be properly recognized and targeted.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
14K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K