How to Calculate the Electric Field Near a Long Charged Wire?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the electric field at a point 2.00 cm from the midpoint of a 1.94 m long thin wire with a total charge of 4.78 µC. The relevant equations include E = kq/r² and E = kQx/((x² + a²)^(3/2)). The hint provided emphasizes the use of Gauss's law for long wires, which simplifies the calculation when the wire length is significantly greater than the distance from the wire. The user initially attempted to apply the second formula but ultimately resolved the problem using Gauss's law.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electric fields and Coulomb's law
  • Familiarity with Gauss's law and its applications
  • Basic knowledge of calculus for integration
  • Proficiency in using the constants k (Coulomb's constant) and charge units (µC)
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of Gauss's law in various geometries
  • Learn about electric field calculations for different charge distributions
  • Explore the concept of electric field lines and their significance
  • Investigate the relationship between electric fields and potential energy
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics, particularly those studying electromagnetism, as well as educators and anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of electric fields and their calculations.

K3nt70
Messages
82
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Calculate the electric field at a point 2.00 cm perpendicular to the midpoint of a 1.94 m long thin wire carrying a total charge of 4.78 uC.

Hint: You could integrate BUT if the wire is very long compared to the distance from the wire to where you are calculating the electric field, then the electric field will be radial and Gauss's law might be easier.

Homework Equations



E = [tex]\frac{kq}{r^2}[/tex]

where k = 9E9
q = 4.78E-6
r = 0.02 m

E = [tex]\frac{kQx}{(x^2 + a^2)^(3/2)}[/tex]


The Attempt at a Solution



First i tried to use the second formula where i made the wire into a circle and used 0.02m as the radius. That didnt work, so i used gauss's formula as the hint suggests, which also didnt work. Suggestions?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Nevermind, i solved it.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
5K
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
23
Views
5K