MHB How to Calculate the Equation of a Tangent Line to a Circle?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathmari
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Tangent
Click For Summary
To calculate the equation of a tangent line to a circle, the tangent at point P1 is perpendicular to the line connecting the circle's center M to P1. The slope of the tangent line is derived from the slope of the line segment MP1, leading to the equation of the tangent in the form y = mx + n. For points outside the circle, the equation can be expressed using the normal vector and the distance from the center to the tangent line, resulting in a general form that incorporates the radius. The discussion also touches on the projection of vectors and the Hesse normal form for further understanding of tangent lines.
mathmari
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
4,984
Reaction score
7
Hey! :o

Let $K$ be a circle with center $M=(x_0 \mid y_0)$ and radius $r$ and let $P_1=(x_1\mid y_1)$ be a point of the circle.

I have done the following tofind the equation of the tangent that passes through $P_1$:
The tangent passes through $P_1$ and is perpendicular to $MP$, then let $m_T$ be the slope of the tangent and $m_{MP}$ be the slope of $MP$, then it holds that $m_T\cdot m_{MP}=-1$.

The equation of the tangent is in the form $y=m_Tx+n$.

The slope of $MP$ is $\frac{y_1-y_0}{x_1-x_0}$. The slope of the tangent is therefore \begin{equation*}m_T=-\frac{1}{m_{MP}}=-\frac{1}{\frac{y_1-y_0}{x_1-x_0}}=-\frac{x_1-x_0}{y_1-y_0}\end{equation*}

We get that \begin{equation*}y=-\frac{x_1-x_0}{y_1-y_0}x+n\end{equation*}

Since the tangent passes through $P_1=(x_1\mid y_1)$, it satisfies the equation of the tangent, so we have the following: \begin{equation*}y_1=-\frac{x_1-x_0}{y_1-y_0}x_1+n \Rightarrow n=y_1+\frac{x_1-x_0}{y_1-y_0}x_1\end{equation*}

The equation of the tangent is therefore \begin{align*}&y=-\frac{x_1-x_0}{y_1-y_0}x+y_1+\frac{x_1-x_0}{y_1-y_0}x_1 \\ & \Rightarrow (y_1-y_0)y=-(x_1-x_0)x+y_1(y_1-y_0)+(x_1-x_0)x_1 \\ & \Rightarrow (y_1-y_0)y=-(x_1-x_0)x+y_1(y_1-y_0)-y_0(y_1-y_0)+y_0(y_1-y_0)+(x_1-x_0)x_1-(x_1-x_0)x_0+(x_1-x_0)x_0 \\ & \Rightarrow (y_1-y_0)y=-(x_1-x_0)x+(y_1-y_0)(y_1-y_0)+y_0(y_1-y_0)+(x_1-x_0)(x_1-x_0)+(x_1-x_0)x_0 \\ & \Rightarrow (y_1-y_0)y=-(x_1-x_0)x+(y_1-y_0)^2+y_0(y_1-y_0)+(x_1-x_0)^2+(x_1-x_0)x_0 \\ & \Rightarrow (y_1-y_0)y=-(x_1-x_0)(x-x_0)+(y_1-y_0)^2+y_0(y_1-y_0)+(x_1-x_0)^2 \\ & \Rightarrow (y_1-y_0)y-y_0(y_1-y_0)+(x_1-x_0)(x-x_0)=(y_1-y_0)^2+(x_1-x_0)^2 \\ & \Rightarrow (y_1-y_0)(y-y_0)+(x_1-x_0)(x-x_0)=(y_1-y_0)^2+(x_1-x_0)^2\end{align*}

The equation of the circle is $(x-x_0)^2+(y-y_0)^2=r^2$. Since $P_1$ is a point of the circle we have that $(x_1-x_0)^2+(y_1-y_0)^2=r^2$.

So we get the following equation of the tangent: \begin{equation*}(y_1-y_0)(y-y_0)+(x_1-x_0)(x-x_0)=r^2\end{equation*}
Is everything correct? (Wondering) Let $K$ be a circle with center $M(x_0\mid y_0)$ and radius $r$. For each point $P$ outside the circle, let $g_P$ be the line through the two intersection points of the tangent to $K$ by $O$.

What do we do in this case where $P$ is outside the circle to determine the equation of the tangent? Could you give me a hint?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hey mathmari! (Smile)

mathmari said:
So we get the following equation of the tangent: \begin{equation*}(y_1-y_0)(y-y_0)+(x_1-x_0)(x-x_0)=r^2\end{equation*}

Is everything correct? (Wondering)

Yep. All correct. (Nod)

mathmari said:
Let $K$ be a circle with center $M(x_0\mid y_0)$ and radius $r$. For each point $P$ outside the circle, let $g_P$ be the line through the two intersection points of the tangent to $K$ by $O$.

What do we do in this case where $P$ is outside the circle to determine the equation of the tangent? Could you give me a hint?

Let's consider an alternative for the first part first.

We can express the equation of the tangent as:
$$(\mathbf x - \mathbf x_0)\cdot \mathbf n = r \tag 1$$
where $\mathbf x$ is a vector on the tangent line, $\mathbf x_0 = (x_0 \mid y_0)$, and $\mathbf n$ is the normal vector of unit length.
That is, the distance of the tangent line to the center must be $r$.
Or put otherwise, the projection of the vector from the center to a point on the tangent onto the normal vector of unit length must have length $r$.

In our particular case, we can pick:
$$\mathbf n = \frac{\mathbf x_1 - \mathbf x_0}{\|\mathbf x_1 - \mathbf x_0\|} = \frac{\mathbf x_1 - \mathbf x_0}{r}$$
where $\mathbf x_1 = (x_1 \mid y_1)$

When we substitute this $\mathbf n$ in $(1)$, it follows that:
$$(\mathbf x - \mathbf x_0)\cdot \frac{\mathbf x_1 - \mathbf x_0}{r} = r
\quad\Rightarrow\quad (\mathbf x - \mathbf x_0)\cdot (\mathbf x_1 - \mathbf x_0) = (x-x_0)(x_1-x_0) + (y-y_0)(y_1-y_0) = r^2
$$
(Thinking)Okay. Now let's get back to the second part.
It means that we can again write the equation of the tangent as:
$$(\mathbf x - \mathbf x_0)\cdot \mathbf n = r$$
In particular this holds for $\mathbf P$:
$$(\mathbf P - \mathbf x_0)\cdot \mathbf n = r$$
Can we solve $\mathbf n$ from that? (Wondering)
 
I like Serena said:
Let's consider an alternative for the first part first.

We can express the equation of the tangent as:
$$(\mathbf x - \mathbf x_0)\cdot \mathbf n = r \tag 1$$
where $\mathbf x$ is a vector on the tangent line, $\mathbf x_0 = (x_0 \mid y_0)$, and $\mathbf n$ is the normal vector of unit length.
That is, the distance of the tangent line to the center must be $r$.
Or put otherwise, the projection of the vector from the center to a point on the tangent onto the normal vector of unit length must have length $r$.
I haven't really understood why we can write equation of the tangent as $(\mathbf x - \mathbf x_0)\cdot \mathbf n = r$.
The difference $\mathbf x - \mathbf x_0$ is equal to $ \mathbf x_0\mathbf x$, right? Why do we multiply that by the normal vector of unit length to get the radius? (Wondering)
 
mathmari said:
I haven't really understood why we can write equation of the tangent as $(\mathbf x - \mathbf x_0)\cdot \mathbf n = r$.
The difference $\mathbf x - \mathbf x_0$ is equal to $ \mathbf x_0\mathbf x$, right? Why do we multiply that by the normal vector of unit length to get the radius? (Wondering)

Let's first take a look at what a dot product is.
And in particular how it related to projection.
View attachment 6972
See this article about scalar projection.

More specifically, we can find the projection function $\boldsymbol\pi_{\mathbf n}(\mathbf x)$ that projects a vector $\mathbf x$ onto a vector $\mathbf n$.
\begin{tikzpicture}[>=stealth]
\draw[->, green!70!black, thick] (0,0) -- (4,0) node[below] {$\boldsymbol\pi_{\mathbf n}(\mathbf x)= (\mathbf x\cdot \mathbf n)\mathbf n$};
\draw[->, blue, ultra thick] (0,0) -- node[above left] {$\mathbf x$} (4,3);
\draw[->, red, ultra thick] (0,0) -- node[below] {$\mathbf n$} (1,0);
\draw[green!70!black] (4,0) rectangle +(-0.3,0.3);
\draw[green!70!black, thick, dashed] (4,3) -- (4,0) rectangle +(-0.3,0.3);
\end{tikzpicture}

The projection function is given by:
$$\boldsymbol\pi_{\mathbf n}(\mathbf x) = \frac{\mathbf x\cdot\mathbf n}{\mathbf n \cdot \mathbf n}\ \mathbf n \tag 1$$
In the case that $\mathbf n$ is a vector of unit length, we can simplify this to:
$$\boldsymbol\pi_{\mathbf n}(\mathbf x)= (\mathbf x\cdot \mathbf n)\mathbf n \tag 2$$Are you with me so far? (Wondering)
Next is how we can use this in combination with the Hesse normal form of a line.
 

Attachments

  • 200px-Dot_Product.svg.png
    200px-Dot_Product.svg.png
    2.1 KB · Views: 115
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K