MHB How to Calculate the Equation of a Tangent Line to a Circle?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathmari
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Tangent
mathmari
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
4,984
Reaction score
7
Hey! :o

Let $K$ be a circle with center $M=(x_0 \mid y_0)$ and radius $r$ and let $P_1=(x_1\mid y_1)$ be a point of the circle.

I have done the following tofind the equation of the tangent that passes through $P_1$:
The tangent passes through $P_1$ and is perpendicular to $MP$, then let $m_T$ be the slope of the tangent and $m_{MP}$ be the slope of $MP$, then it holds that $m_T\cdot m_{MP}=-1$.

The equation of the tangent is in the form $y=m_Tx+n$.

The slope of $MP$ is $\frac{y_1-y_0}{x_1-x_0}$. The slope of the tangent is therefore \begin{equation*}m_T=-\frac{1}{m_{MP}}=-\frac{1}{\frac{y_1-y_0}{x_1-x_0}}=-\frac{x_1-x_0}{y_1-y_0}\end{equation*}

We get that \begin{equation*}y=-\frac{x_1-x_0}{y_1-y_0}x+n\end{equation*}

Since the tangent passes through $P_1=(x_1\mid y_1)$, it satisfies the equation of the tangent, so we have the following: \begin{equation*}y_1=-\frac{x_1-x_0}{y_1-y_0}x_1+n \Rightarrow n=y_1+\frac{x_1-x_0}{y_1-y_0}x_1\end{equation*}

The equation of the tangent is therefore \begin{align*}&y=-\frac{x_1-x_0}{y_1-y_0}x+y_1+\frac{x_1-x_0}{y_1-y_0}x_1 \\ & \Rightarrow (y_1-y_0)y=-(x_1-x_0)x+y_1(y_1-y_0)+(x_1-x_0)x_1 \\ & \Rightarrow (y_1-y_0)y=-(x_1-x_0)x+y_1(y_1-y_0)-y_0(y_1-y_0)+y_0(y_1-y_0)+(x_1-x_0)x_1-(x_1-x_0)x_0+(x_1-x_0)x_0 \\ & \Rightarrow (y_1-y_0)y=-(x_1-x_0)x+(y_1-y_0)(y_1-y_0)+y_0(y_1-y_0)+(x_1-x_0)(x_1-x_0)+(x_1-x_0)x_0 \\ & \Rightarrow (y_1-y_0)y=-(x_1-x_0)x+(y_1-y_0)^2+y_0(y_1-y_0)+(x_1-x_0)^2+(x_1-x_0)x_0 \\ & \Rightarrow (y_1-y_0)y=-(x_1-x_0)(x-x_0)+(y_1-y_0)^2+y_0(y_1-y_0)+(x_1-x_0)^2 \\ & \Rightarrow (y_1-y_0)y-y_0(y_1-y_0)+(x_1-x_0)(x-x_0)=(y_1-y_0)^2+(x_1-x_0)^2 \\ & \Rightarrow (y_1-y_0)(y-y_0)+(x_1-x_0)(x-x_0)=(y_1-y_0)^2+(x_1-x_0)^2\end{align*}

The equation of the circle is $(x-x_0)^2+(y-y_0)^2=r^2$. Since $P_1$ is a point of the circle we have that $(x_1-x_0)^2+(y_1-y_0)^2=r^2$.

So we get the following equation of the tangent: \begin{equation*}(y_1-y_0)(y-y_0)+(x_1-x_0)(x-x_0)=r^2\end{equation*}
Is everything correct? (Wondering) Let $K$ be a circle with center $M(x_0\mid y_0)$ and radius $r$. For each point $P$ outside the circle, let $g_P$ be the line through the two intersection points of the tangent to $K$ by $O$.

What do we do in this case where $P$ is outside the circle to determine the equation of the tangent? Could you give me a hint?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hey mathmari! (Smile)

mathmari said:
So we get the following equation of the tangent: \begin{equation*}(y_1-y_0)(y-y_0)+(x_1-x_0)(x-x_0)=r^2\end{equation*}

Is everything correct? (Wondering)

Yep. All correct. (Nod)

mathmari said:
Let $K$ be a circle with center $M(x_0\mid y_0)$ and radius $r$. For each point $P$ outside the circle, let $g_P$ be the line through the two intersection points of the tangent to $K$ by $O$.

What do we do in this case where $P$ is outside the circle to determine the equation of the tangent? Could you give me a hint?

Let's consider an alternative for the first part first.

We can express the equation of the tangent as:
$$(\mathbf x - \mathbf x_0)\cdot \mathbf n = r \tag 1$$
where $\mathbf x$ is a vector on the tangent line, $\mathbf x_0 = (x_0 \mid y_0)$, and $\mathbf n$ is the normal vector of unit length.
That is, the distance of the tangent line to the center must be $r$.
Or put otherwise, the projection of the vector from the center to a point on the tangent onto the normal vector of unit length must have length $r$.

In our particular case, we can pick:
$$\mathbf n = \frac{\mathbf x_1 - \mathbf x_0}{\|\mathbf x_1 - \mathbf x_0\|} = \frac{\mathbf x_1 - \mathbf x_0}{r}$$
where $\mathbf x_1 = (x_1 \mid y_1)$

When we substitute this $\mathbf n$ in $(1)$, it follows that:
$$(\mathbf x - \mathbf x_0)\cdot \frac{\mathbf x_1 - \mathbf x_0}{r} = r
\quad\Rightarrow\quad (\mathbf x - \mathbf x_0)\cdot (\mathbf x_1 - \mathbf x_0) = (x-x_0)(x_1-x_0) + (y-y_0)(y_1-y_0) = r^2
$$
(Thinking)Okay. Now let's get back to the second part.
It means that we can again write the equation of the tangent as:
$$(\mathbf x - \mathbf x_0)\cdot \mathbf n = r$$
In particular this holds for $\mathbf P$:
$$(\mathbf P - \mathbf x_0)\cdot \mathbf n = r$$
Can we solve $\mathbf n$ from that? (Wondering)
 
I like Serena said:
Let's consider an alternative for the first part first.

We can express the equation of the tangent as:
$$(\mathbf x - \mathbf x_0)\cdot \mathbf n = r \tag 1$$
where $\mathbf x$ is a vector on the tangent line, $\mathbf x_0 = (x_0 \mid y_0)$, and $\mathbf n$ is the normal vector of unit length.
That is, the distance of the tangent line to the center must be $r$.
Or put otherwise, the projection of the vector from the center to a point on the tangent onto the normal vector of unit length must have length $r$.
I haven't really understood why we can write equation of the tangent as $(\mathbf x - \mathbf x_0)\cdot \mathbf n = r$.
The difference $\mathbf x - \mathbf x_0$ is equal to $ \mathbf x_0\mathbf x$, right? Why do we multiply that by the normal vector of unit length to get the radius? (Wondering)
 
mathmari said:
I haven't really understood why we can write equation of the tangent as $(\mathbf x - \mathbf x_0)\cdot \mathbf n = r$.
The difference $\mathbf x - \mathbf x_0$ is equal to $ \mathbf x_0\mathbf x$, right? Why do we multiply that by the normal vector of unit length to get the radius? (Wondering)

Let's first take a look at what a dot product is.
And in particular how it related to projection.
View attachment 6972
See this article about scalar projection.

More specifically, we can find the projection function $\boldsymbol\pi_{\mathbf n}(\mathbf x)$ that projects a vector $\mathbf x$ onto a vector $\mathbf n$.
\begin{tikzpicture}[>=stealth]
\draw[->, green!70!black, thick] (0,0) -- (4,0) node[below] {$\boldsymbol\pi_{\mathbf n}(\mathbf x)= (\mathbf x\cdot \mathbf n)\mathbf n$};
\draw[->, blue, ultra thick] (0,0) -- node[above left] {$\mathbf x$} (4,3);
\draw[->, red, ultra thick] (0,0) -- node[below] {$\mathbf n$} (1,0);
\draw[green!70!black] (4,0) rectangle +(-0.3,0.3);
\draw[green!70!black, thick, dashed] (4,3) -- (4,0) rectangle +(-0.3,0.3);
\end{tikzpicture}

The projection function is given by:
$$\boldsymbol\pi_{\mathbf n}(\mathbf x) = \frac{\mathbf x\cdot\mathbf n}{\mathbf n \cdot \mathbf n}\ \mathbf n \tag 1$$
In the case that $\mathbf n$ is a vector of unit length, we can simplify this to:
$$\boldsymbol\pi_{\mathbf n}(\mathbf x)= (\mathbf x\cdot \mathbf n)\mathbf n \tag 2$$Are you with me so far? (Wondering)
Next is how we can use this in combination with the Hesse normal form of a line.
 

Attachments

  • 200px-Dot_Product.svg.png
    200px-Dot_Product.svg.png
    2.1 KB · Views: 104
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...

Similar threads

Back
Top