How to calculate torque for bicep in rotational motion?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating torque related to the bicep muscle's function in holding a forearm at different positions and weights. The problem involves understanding the forces acting on the forearm, which is treated as a uniform rod, and how these forces contribute to the torque about the elbow joint.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the calculation of torque using different forces and angles, questioning the assumptions made about the moments acting on the elbow joint. There is discussion on the correct application of torque equations and the influence of angles on the forces involved.

Discussion Status

Some participants have confirmed the correctness of initial calculations while others have raised concerns about the logic applied in subsequent parts. There is an ongoing examination of the relationships between the torques produced by the bicep, the forearm, and any external weights. Multiple interpretations of the forces and angles are being explored.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of considering the angle between the weight and the moment arm, as well as ensuring correct unit usage for torque calculations. There is a mention of the need to clarify the forces acting on the system and how they interact.

faoltaem
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
would someone be able to tell me if this is right or what I've done wrong? thankyou

Homework Statement



a) What torque does the bicep muscle have to apply to hold the forearm of mass 1.10 kg and length 30 cm horizontally? Assume the arm is a rod of uniform mass density.
b) What torque does the bicep need to apply if the forearm is to hold a 20 kg weight in one hand at an angle of 20[tex]\circ[/tex] below horizontal?

Homework Equations



[tex]\tau[/tex] = Fx = mgx
[tex]\tau[/tex] = Fsin[tex]\theta[/tex]
[tex]\Sigma[/tex][tex]\tau[/tex] = 0

The Attempt at a Solution



a) m = 1.1kg x = 15cm = 0.15m
[tex]\tau[/tex] = Fx = mgx = 1.1 x 9.81 x 0.15
= 1.61865
= 2Nm

b) m[tex]_{o}[/tex] = 20kg [tex]\theta[/tex] = 20[tex]\circ[/tex]
[tex]\Sigma[/tex][tex]\tau[/tex] = 0
[tex]\tau[/tex][tex]_{1}[/tex] + [tex]\tau[/tex][tex]_{2}[/tex] = 0
[tex]\tau[/tex][tex]_{a}[/tex] + [tex]\tau[/tex][tex]_{o}[/tex] = 0 a=arm o=object
[tex]\tau[/tex][tex]_{o}[/tex] = -[tex]\tau[/tex][tex]_{a}[/tex]
Fsin[tex]\theta[/tex]r = -mgx
F x sin20 x 0.3 = -(1.1 x –9.81 x 0.15)
0.1026F = 1.61865

F = [tex]\frac{1.61865}{0.1026}[/tex]
= 15.775
= 16Nm
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Part a is correct. One uses the CM of the arm to determine the moment about the elbow joint.

The logic on part b is not correct. The moment of the object and the moment of the arm work together against the bicep. The torque provided by the bicep must equal the sum of torques of the arm and object.
 
sorry i forgot about the 3rd force
[tex]\Sigma[/tex][tex]\tau[/tex] = 0
[tex]\tau[/tex]1 + [tex]\tau[/tex]2 + [tex]\tau[/tex]3 = 0
[tex]\tau[/tex]1 + [tex]\tau[/tex]2 = -[tex]\tau[/tex]3

but I'm a little unsure about the force of [tex]\tau[/tex]2 (which i have as the object)

is it: -[tex]\tau[/tex]3 = [tex]\tau[/tex]1 + [tex]\tau[/tex]2
= m1gx1 + m2gx2
= 1.1 x 9.81 x 0.15 + 20 x 9.81 0.3
= 60.47865N
[tex]\tau[/tex]3 = -60.47865N
= -6 x 10[tex]^{2}[/tex]N
 
Be careful with units, torque is N-m, as opposed to force which uses N.

Don't forget the angle 20°, which influences the force normal to the moment arm.
 
ok so
[tex]\tau[/tex]1 = Fsin[tex]\theta[/tex]
= mgsin[tex]\theta[/tex]
= 1.1 x -9.81 x sin 20 x 0.15
= -0.5536Nm

[tex]\tau[/tex]2 = Fsin[tex]\theta[/tex]
= mgsin[tex]\theta[/tex]
= 20 x -9.81 x sin 20 x 0.3
= -20.131Nm

-[tex]\tau[/tex]3 = [tex]\tau[/tex]1 + [tex]\tau[/tex]2
= -0.5536 + -20.131
= -20.685Nm

therefore [tex]\tau[/tex]3 = 20.685Nm
or 20.685Nm in an anticlockwise direction
 
I believe one wants the cosine of the angle (between the weight and the normal to the moment arm) in this case or the sine of the angle between the force and the moment arm (which would be 90° + 20°).
 
so if i change sin 20 to cos 20 (or sin 110) i get:

[tex]\tau[/tex]1 = Fsin
= mgsin
= 1.1 x -9.81 x cos 20 x 0.15
= -1.521Nm

[tex]\tau[/tex]2 = Fsin
= mgsin
= 20 x -9.81 x cos 20 x 0.3
= -55.310Nm

-3 = 1 + 2
= -1.521 + -55.310
= -56.831Nm

therefore 3 = 56.831Nm
or 56.831Nm in an anticlockwise direction

is this the correct answer?
(thankyou for all your help)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
10K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
13K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
6K