How to choose Gaussian surface

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the selection of Gaussian surfaces for calculating electric fields, specifically highlighting the use of spherical surfaces for point charges and cylindrical surfaces for infinitely long charged sheets. A spherical surface is preferred for point charges due to its radial symmetry, allowing for uniform electric field calculations using Gauss's Law. In contrast, cylindrical surfaces are ideal for infinitely long charged sheets, as they align with the symmetry of the electric field. The mathematical derivation confirms that the electric field for a point charge is given by E_r(r) = Q / (4 π r²), demonstrating the effectiveness of these Gaussian surfaces in simplifying calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Gauss's Law
  • Familiarity with electric field concepts
  • Knowledge of symmetry in physics
  • Basic calculus for integration
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of Gauss's Law in different geometries
  • Learn about electric field calculations for non-symmetric charge distributions
  • Explore advanced topics in electrostatics, such as potential energy
  • Investigate the use of cylindrical coordinates in electromagnetism
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, electrical engineers, and educators seeking to deepen their understanding of electrostatics and the application of Gaussian surfaces in electric field calculations.

Pushpam Singh
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
1 Why do we choose a spherical surface as gaussian surface for a point charge to calculate electric field?

In my view, the reason may be
i. If we take the point charge at centre, each point of spherical surface will be at same distance from the point charge and thus is equivalent.Thus electric field (perpendicular to the surface ) at every point of the surface will be equivalent .

If we take other surface like cube , the distance between the point charge and every point of cube will be different.Then the calculation becomes hard.

2 Why do we choose a cylinderical surface for a infitely long char?ged sheet , why not other closed surface e.g. cube?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is all about symmetry. You can calculate the electric field for such highly symmetric situations with help of the integral form of Gauß's Law, because you can guess, how it should look like from the symmetry of the problem.

For a point charge, everything is radially symmetric, and thus the electric field must point radially out from the charge, i.e., you must have
\vec{E}(\vec{x})=E_r(r) \frac{\vec{x}}{r},
where r=|\vec{x}|. Then you choose a sphere around the charge, because this gives you the missing component E_r(r). According to Gauß's Law you have (in Heaviside-Lorentz units)
Q=\int_{S_r} \mathrm{d}^2 \vec{F} \cdot \vec{E}=4 \pi r^2 E_r(r)\; \Rightarrow \; E_r(r)=\frac{Q}{4 \pi r^2}.
thus you get the Coulomb field as expected
\vec{E}=\frac{Q}{4 \pi r^3} \vec{x}.

For the infinite line charge the same idea holds. Due to symmetry the field must point radially out from the line, and you can use a cylinder as the surface in Gauß's Law.

For more complicated situations, of course, you cannot guess the field's direction so easily anymore, and then you must apply the local form of the laws and integrate the corresponding differential equations.
 
Pushpam Singh said:
2 Why do we choose a cylinderical surface for a infitely long char?ged sheet , why not other closed surface e.g. cube?
Just about any shape would work as long as the surfaces were parallel and perpendicular to the field. A cube would work fine, as long you oriented it correctly. (A cube at some odd angle to the sheet wouldn't work.)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
473
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K