How to compute the number of loops in a Feynman diagram?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on calculating the number of loops in Feynman diagrams within the context of \(\lambda \phi^{3}\) theory. Participants highlight the importance of understanding the relationship between vertices, internal lines, and external lines in determining loop counts. The conversation also touches on the relevance of Quantum Field Theory (QFT) and the necessity of proper forum categorization for such specific inquiries. Key references include A. Zee's "Quantum Field Theory in a Nutshell" for further insights into the complexities of these calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Feynman diagrams and their components
  • Familiarity with \(\lambda \phi^{3}\) theory
  • Basic knowledge of Quantum Field Theory (QFT)
  • Concept of renormalization in particle physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the process of counting loops in Feynman diagrams
  • Explore the principles of renormalization in Quantum Field Theory
  • Read A. Zee's "Quantum Field Theory in a Nutshell" for advanced concepts
  • Investigate the role of interaction vertices in particle scattering
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, graduate students in theoretical physics, and anyone studying Quantum Field Theory or particle interactions will benefit from this discussion.

lonelyphysicist
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
In doing my \phi^{3} theory I didn't know exactly how to count the number of loops in a diagram given the number of vertices, internal and external lines. Is there a general algorithm in doing this? What if we have more than one interaction vertex (e.g. the Standard Model)?

PS. What does it mean when it says my thread has been "moved"?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
lonelyphysicist said:
PS. What does it mean when it says my thread has been "moved"?

It means an administrator thought that it better belonged to another subforum. If you talk about the "physical mass" thread, I'd like to know why it was moved, because I don't think it is really a college-level question !

cheers,
Patrick.
 
It's nonphysical \lambda \phi^{3}.The vertex (the OPI Green function of 4 points in the first order of perturbation theory) is made up of 3 scalar bosons.Self interaction doesn't mean creating/annihilating particles (that means there's no emission,nor absorption of particles),but only pure scattering (identical particles scattering one off another).

Read Zee's [1] argument against this theory and others involving other powers in \phi.

Daniel.

---------------------------------------------------
[1] A.Zee,"Quantum Field Theory in a Nutshell",PUP,2003.
 
dextercioby said:
It's nonphysical \lambda \phi^{3}.The vertex (the OPI Green function of 4 points in the first order of perturbation theory) is made up of 3 scalar bosons.Self interaction doesn't mean creating/annihilating particles (that means there's no emission,nor absorption of particles),but only pure scattering (identical particles scattering one off another).

Read Zee's [1] argument against this theory and others involving other powers in \phi.

Do you mean my thread was moved because \lambda \phi^{3} is not a physical theory? :smile:
 
No,no,you had put in the wrong forum.It's Quantum Physics related and it should have been posted here.:smile: General Physics is not for such specific problems.

Daniel.
 
Dexter is this a general rule that QFT math questions go in quantum mechanics? Why not particles?
 
Under the "Quantum Physics" forum link it says "Quantum Mechanics and Field Theory" - that's why I posted my questions here.

Anyone who knows some QFT would know that these questions do form the bulk of the QFT experience. Renormalization, for instance, is all about the technicalities - how many loops, how to get rid of the large logs, what subtraction scheme to use, etc. Feynman diagram computation itself involves lots of machinery too.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
6K