How to Correctly Solve for the Minimum Distance Between Two Electrons?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the minimum distance between two electrons using kinetic energy and electric potential energy equations. The initial approach equates kinetic energy to electric potential work, leading to a calculated distance of 5.05 x 10^-10 m. However, participants note that the second electron, being free to move, will not come to rest even at minimum separation, as both electrons will retain kinetic energy. Additionally, the conservation of momentum is highlighted as an important factor in analyzing the system. Overall, the analysis suggests that energy conservation alone is insufficient to fully describe the dynamics of the two electrons.
Jake357
Messages
9
Reaction score
2
Homework Statement
An electron, having the initial velocity of 10^6 m/s, is approaching from a long distance another electron, which is free and at rest. Calculate the maximum force of interaction between the particles. The answer must be 2.26*10^-10 N
Relevant Equations
KE=mv^2/2
F=ke^2/d^2
I tried to make the kinetic energy of the first electron equal to the electric potential work.
mv^2/2=ke^2/d
We have to solve for the minimum distance between them: d=2ke^2/mv^2=5.05*10^-10 m
The force is: F=ke^2/d^2=9*10^-10 N, which is not correct.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The second electron is free to move. Will both electrons ever come to rest?
 
TSny said:
The second electron is free to move. Will both electrons ever come to rest?
When the first electron has the known initial velocity the second electron is at rest (not moving) at a long unknown distance between them. And I think that when they will get the closest possible to each other they will still be moving, thus both having kinetic energy. So no, I don't think they will be at rest.
 
Jake357 said:
When the first electron has the known initial velocity the second electron is at rest (not moving) at a long unknown distance between them. And I think that when they will get the closest possible to each other they will still be moving, thus both having kinetic energy. So no, I don't think they will be at rest.
Yes. So, the initial KE is never completely converted into potential energy.

You might consider analyzing this problem form a different frame of reference that is moving relative to the original frame of reference.

If you want to keep the analysis in the original frame, then think about the relation between the velocities of the electrons when they are at minimum separation. Is there another conservation law besides energy conservation that could be helpful here?
 
TSny said:
Yes. So, the initial KE is never completely converted into potential energy.

You might consider analyzing this problem form a different frame of reference that is moving relative to the original frame of reference.

If you want to keep the analysis in the original frame, then think about the relation between the velocities of the electrons when they are at minimum separation. Is there another conservation law besides energy conservation that could be helpful here?
I think the conservation of momentum also should be used.
 
Jake357 said:
I think the conservation of momentum also should be used.
Yes.
 
Thread 'Minimum mass of a block'
Here we know that if block B is going to move up or just be at the verge of moving up ##Mg \sin \theta ## will act downwards and maximum static friction will act downwards ## \mu Mg \cos \theta ## Now what im confused by is how will we know " how quickly" block B reaches its maximum static friction value without any numbers, the suggested solution says that when block A is at its maximum extension, then block B will start to move up but with a certain set of values couldn't block A reach...
TL;DR Summary: Find Electric field due to charges between 2 parallel infinite planes using Gauss law at any point Here's the diagram. We have a uniform p (rho) density of charges between 2 infinite planes in the cartesian coordinates system. I used a cube of thickness a that spans from z=-a/2 to z=a/2 as a Gaussian surface, each side of the cube has area A. I know that the field depends only on z since there is translational invariance in x and y directions because the planes are...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Back
Top