How to Correctly Solve for the Minimum Distance Between Two Electrons?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the minimum distance between two electrons using kinetic energy and electric potential energy equations. The initial approach equates kinetic energy to electric potential work, leading to a calculated distance of 5.05 x 10^-10 m. However, participants note that the second electron, being free to move, will not come to rest even at minimum separation, as both electrons will retain kinetic energy. Additionally, the conservation of momentum is highlighted as an important factor in analyzing the system. Overall, the analysis suggests that energy conservation alone is insufficient to fully describe the dynamics of the two electrons.
Jake357
Messages
9
Reaction score
2
Homework Statement
An electron, having the initial velocity of 10^6 m/s, is approaching from a long distance another electron, which is free and at rest. Calculate the maximum force of interaction between the particles. The answer must be 2.26*10^-10 N
Relevant Equations
KE=mv^2/2
F=ke^2/d^2
I tried to make the kinetic energy of the first electron equal to the electric potential work.
mv^2/2=ke^2/d
We have to solve for the minimum distance between them: d=2ke^2/mv^2=5.05*10^-10 m
The force is: F=ke^2/d^2=9*10^-10 N, which is not correct.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The second electron is free to move. Will both electrons ever come to rest?
 
TSny said:
The second electron is free to move. Will both electrons ever come to rest?
When the first electron has the known initial velocity the second electron is at rest (not moving) at a long unknown distance between them. And I think that when they will get the closest possible to each other they will still be moving, thus both having kinetic energy. So no, I don't think they will be at rest.
 
Jake357 said:
When the first electron has the known initial velocity the second electron is at rest (not moving) at a long unknown distance between them. And I think that when they will get the closest possible to each other they will still be moving, thus both having kinetic energy. So no, I don't think they will be at rest.
Yes. So, the initial KE is never completely converted into potential energy.

You might consider analyzing this problem form a different frame of reference that is moving relative to the original frame of reference.

If you want to keep the analysis in the original frame, then think about the relation between the velocities of the electrons when they are at minimum separation. Is there another conservation law besides energy conservation that could be helpful here?
 
TSny said:
Yes. So, the initial KE is never completely converted into potential energy.

You might consider analyzing this problem form a different frame of reference that is moving relative to the original frame of reference.

If you want to keep the analysis in the original frame, then think about the relation between the velocities of the electrons when they are at minimum separation. Is there another conservation law besides energy conservation that could be helpful here?
I think the conservation of momentum also should be used.
 
Jake357 said:
I think the conservation of momentum also should be used.
Yes.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top