How to create heat using a falling object?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on generating heat through the motion of falling objects, specifically a heavy ball dropped from a height of 30 meters. Participants concluded that significant heat generation is limited by gravitational potential energy and the mass of the object. The concept of using friction and materials that heat up easily was explored, along with practical examples such as hydroelectric dams and cooling systems in industrial settings. Ultimately, the consensus is that while some heat can be generated, it is not substantial without large-scale applications or specific mechanisms like a fire piston.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of gravitational potential energy
  • Knowledge of the Mechanical Equivalent of Heat (4.2 Joules per Calorie)
  • Familiarity with heat transfer mechanisms, including friction
  • Basic principles of hydroelectric power generation
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of gravitational potential energy and its calculations
  • Explore the Mechanical Equivalent of Heat and its applications in engineering
  • Investigate the design and function of fire pistons for heat generation
  • Study the efficiency of hydroelectric power systems in converting kinetic energy to electricity
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, physicists, and anyone interested in thermodynamics, energy conversion, and practical applications of falling objects in heat generation.

Yoann
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
Hello!

I am trying to think of ways to generate significant amounts of heat through the motion of a falling object? Let's say we have a heavy ball and a structure that enables it to fall from a height of 30m for instance, how would you go about creating heat? I suppose you would have to use friction and materials that heat up easily?

Thanks!
 
Science news on Phys.org
728px-Joule%27s_Apparatus_%28Harper%27s_Scan%29.png
 
Thanks paisiello2!

So I imagine the friction of the weight on the right heats that poll? Do you know the type of material used? And to what degree it can heat if repeated?
 
I think you are limited by gravitational potential energy. You need a lot of mass or a very far falling distance to get significant heat. I'm thinking like a meteor. The medium is useful for extracting the heat (which is what I think the apparatus above is doing) but its not going to generate any more heat. Too viscous of a medium and your object will come to a stop.
 
Yoann said:
Thanks paisiello2!

So I imagine the friction of the weight on the right heats that poll? Do you know the type of material used? And to what degree it can heat if repeated?

No, the motion of the pallets in the water will heat up the water. There is no pole on the right hand side. Just a ruler to measure the height.
 
Thank you so much nasu, I was way off! haha That's interesting, but I assume it wouldn't heat the water much, even if it were repeated many times, right?

Thanks ModusPwnd, I see what you're saying. So all in all, it's not possible to create much heat simply using falling objects (unless we're talking of huge scales, like a meteors).
 
You could just keep dropping something onto a block of lead, that will transfer most of the kinetic energy into heatng of the metal.
 
Yoann said:
...but I assume it wouldn't heat the water much, even if it were repeated many times, right?
It's measurable.
 
  • #10
I worked on a cooling plant at a chocolate factory: big vats (vw bug sized) where they ground beans and stirred mixtures had 100 kW motors and needed water cooled jackets to keep from burning the chocolate.
 
  • #11
They used to have a quantity called the "Mechanical Equivalent of Heat" when I was a lad. (We have the same thing now but it isn't given that descriptive name).
It is 4.2 Joules per Calorie.
Now, a Joule is the energy needed to lift 0.1kg (weighs one Newton) by 1m. Quite an appreciable and could-be-useful bit of work.
A Calorie (Not the 'calorie' on food packaging - which is one kilocalorie) is the energy needed to raise the temperature of just 1g of water by 1 degree C - a hardly noticeable quantity of heat.

You need a lot of useful mechanical work to provide a not really useful amount of heat.
Russ's 100kW motors (100kJ per second!) were really serious pieces of kit (motorcar engine sizes). There are not many places where you can get that sort of Power from 'a falling object'. Hydroelectric power stations are the only things that come to mind as constant sources of serious amounts of Power from falling objects.
 
  • #12
NascentOxygen said:
You could just keep dropping something onto a block of lead, that will transfer most of the kinetic energy into heatng of the metal.
More durable would be a cylinder of air with a piston uppermost but sealed at the base. The falling weight would compress the air, heating it. A water jacket would extract the heat. (Remember pumping up your bike tyres?)
 
  • #13
Thanks ModusPwnd, I see what you're saying. So all in all, it's not possible to create much heat simply using falling objects.

Easy to work out...

1kg falling 30m can provide about 1*9.8*30 = 300 Joules approx.

Enough to heat 1kg of water by about 300/4181 = 0.07 degrees.
 
  • #14
The problem is to find a significant source of 'dropping objects'.

I remember hearing about the original slaughterhouses in Chicago (millions of animals to feed the US population). The whole system was worked by the energy of the animals walking to the top of a multi-storey building. They were carried down the production line by gravity on a sloping rail with chops and steaks appearing at the bottom. Bummer of an energy source, as far as the cattle were concerned, eh?
 
  • #15
Yoann said:
Hello!

I am trying to think of ways to generate significant amounts of heat through the motion of a falling object? Let's say we have a heavy ball and a structure that enables it to fall from a height of 30m for instance, how would you go about creating heat? I suppose you would have to use friction and materials that heat up easily?

Thanks!

Use a fire piston and a falling weight to depress the piston.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
9K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K