B How to cut a plate onto a tube at an angle?

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter Drpia
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Angle Plate Tube
AI Thread Summary
To cut a plate onto a tube at an angle, understanding the geometry is crucial, particularly the relationship between the minor and major axes. The minor axis is defined by the tubing's diameter, while the major axis can be calculated using trigonometric functions based on the desired angle. The formulas provided for radius calculations are close but may require adjustment based on the specific angle of the plate to the tubing. Clarifying the angle and the exact dimensions needed can help refine the calculations. Accurate measurements and a clear understanding of the elliptical properties will lead to a successful design.
Drpia
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
Formula for a plate to sit on end on a tube at an angle
I'm trying to draw a file for a plate that will sit on a piece of 6inch tubing at an angle. I can't quite get the radius right. I've tried
R=(.5mM)÷square root of (m squared + M sqaured) m=minor diameter M=major diameter
And I've tried R=(H÷2)+(W squared ÷ 8H)
H= height of arc W=width of arc
The second one gets close but its still not quite right. Is there another formula for this?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I'm sure there are other ways. I'm not quite sure where you are running into trouble.

Do you know the angle of the plate to the tubing?
What result is it that you are looking for? The properties of the ellipse, drawn on your plate?

Obviously the minor axis will be six inches. You should be able to work out the major axis AB pretty easily using soh-cah-toa:
1730137795084.png


For example, if angle α is 30 degrees, that should make for a major axis of 6.928":
1730137272867.png

1730137320503.png
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Back
Top