How to deal with charge imbalance in a chemical system?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a charge imbalance issue encountered in a chemical system input into a computational program for calculating chemical reactions. The participant is unsure about the implications of this imbalance and how it affects the results, particularly in relation to Gibbs free energy minimization and the Law of Mass Action.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • The participant is using a program that calculates chemical reactions based on a published chemical system but encounters a charge imbalance error.
  • There is confusion regarding the significance of the charge balance problem and its implications for the accuracy of the results.
  • Some participants suggest that the method used by the original authors (Law of Mass Action) may not depend on charge balance, raising questions about the validity of the input data.
  • Concerns are expressed about the program's ability to add or subtract charge to achieve balance, with implications that this could alter the nature of the reactions and lead to incorrect pH values.
  • A participant inquires whether the initial input concentrations were balanced and if the specified pH includes initial H+ and OH- concentrations.
  • There is a request for references to the original paper to clarify the methodology and results.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express uncertainty about the charge balance issue and its significance, with no consensus on how to resolve the problem or the appropriateness of the methods used. Multiple viewpoints regarding the implications of charge balance and the methods employed remain present.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights potential limitations in understanding the relationship between charge balance and the methods used for calculations, as well as the dependence on specific input values and assumptions about the chemical system.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for individuals interested in computational chemistry, particularly those dealing with charge balance in chemical systems and the implications for reaction modeling.

bzz77
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
I'm using a program for calculating chemical reactions, but I'm not a chemist. I will use the results for a different type of calculation. Sorry, this is probably a silly question.

As input for the program, I am using a chemical system that someone published. it contains:

SO4(2-), Ca2+, Na+, K+, Mg2+, Cl-, HCO3-. It has a specified pH. Each ion has a concentration value.

The problem is that when I put all this into the program, I get an error saying that I have a charge imbalance. I'm very confused because this is a chemical system that has apparently been used many times before. I'm not sure if this is important, but the method my program is based on is Gibbs free energy minimization. The method that was previously used on this system was the Law of Mass Action.

My program can add or subtract charge to make things balance, but this seems dangerous to me. Wouldn't this change the kinds of reactions that can happen? Also, when I do this, I get a crazy pH that is very different that the one published.

Does anyone have any insight into dealing with this? Or understanding it? Thank you very much.
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
I'm sure Borek will chime in with more pertinent comments, but I for one would like to see the reaction you're considering.
 
Thanks for your reply, Dr. Claude. I'm not familiar with Borek (?). I'm not considering a specific reaction. I input the ions listed above with their published values, then the program uses Gibbs free energy minimization to calculate amounts of mineral and aqueous species.

I am woefully ignorant about chemistry, but I don't understand how the people who published about this system (they used the LMA method to calculate amounts of mineral and aqueous species--maybe the LMA method doesn't depend on charge?) didn't have this charge balance problem. Also, I don't understand the significance of the charge balance problem or how to fix it. My program adds a charge to make things balance (or I can change my species amounts), but then the calculated pH is very different than theirs. This doesn't seem right. I would like to reproduce their results.
 
bzz77 said:
Thanks for your reply, Dr. Claude. I'm not familiar with Borek (?). I'm not considering a specific reaction. I input the ions listed above with their published values, then the program uses Gibbs free energy minimization to calculate amounts of mineral and aqueous species.
He's one of the admins of PF, and very active in the Chemistry subforum.

bzz77 said:
I am woefully ignorant about chemistry, but I don't understand how the people who published about this system (they used the LMA method to calculate amounts of mineral and aqueous species--maybe the LMA method doesn't depend on charge?) didn't have this charge balance problem. Also, I don't understand the significance of the charge balance problem or how to fix it. My program adds a charge to make things balance (or I can change my species amounts), but then the calculated pH is very different than theirs. This doesn't seem right. I would like to reproduce their results.
Can you give references then? I get no idea of what you are doing and what you want to achieve.
 
Yeah, link us to the paper. It seems to me that if you're following a prep, you can just use the exact numbers that they're using there. Or are you trying to change it to something else?
 
Are your initial input concentrations to the model such that the charges are balanced to begin with? When you say that it has a specified pH, does this mean that the initial H+ and OH- concentrations are also specified initially?

Chet
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
9K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
9K
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K