How to derive an equation from a graph

  • Thread starter Thread starter Cryphisss
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Derive Graph
Cryphisss
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Hello! I have two graphs which I need to find if there is relationship between them (all in one).

I have to create a formula/equation that can show and prove that there is this relationship between them.I am really confused at the moment since I do not know if there is any correlation, I have examined the two graphs and so far I don't think there is any correlation. The graph represents Prey and Predators number. X axis is time (weeks), Y axis is numbers. When the pre

y number starts to increase the predator number starts to increase as well.

Here are the numbers of Prey from week 15 to 25:

495, 550, 560, 620, 720, 690, 750, 740, 950, 800, 650

And here are the number of population for Predators from week 15 to week 25:

15, 20, 50, 80, 110, 190, 200, 250, 360, 380, 650,

Homework Equations



Can I also use LinReg (for Prey graph) and ExpReg (for Predator graph) on a GDC? (Ti-84+)

The Attempt at a Solution



I created a scatter plot which can be found to the attached documents so it can be easier for me to illustrate if there is any correlation.
Also it is clearly visible on the predator graph that it is Exponential however the prey graph is not.

About the formula I was thinking of something like P = a.e^Inb.t

Homework Statement


Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution

 

Attachments

  • tmp23.jpg
    tmp23.jpg
    23.9 KB · Views: 486
  • Screen Shot 2013-11-05 at 20.32.47.png
    Screen Shot 2013-11-05 at 20.32.47.png
    6.9 KB · Views: 521
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Cryphisss said:

Homework Statement



Hello! I have two graphs which I need to find if there is relationship between them (all in one).

I have to create a formula/equation that can show and prove that there is this relationship between them.


I am really confused at the moment since I do not know if there is any correlation, I have examined the two graphs and so far I don't think there is any correlation.


The graph represents Pray and Predators number. X axis is time (weeks), Y axis is numbers. When the pray number starts to increase the predator number starts to increase as well.

Here are the numbers of Pray from week 15 to 25:

495, 550, 560, 620, 720, 690, 750, 740, 950, 800, 650

And here are the number of population for Predators from week 15 to week 25:

15, 20, 50, 80, 110, 190, 200, 250, 360, 380, 650,


Homework Equations



Can I also use LinReg (for Pray graph) and ExpReg (for Predator graph) on a GDC? (Ti-84+)

The Attempt at a Solution



I created a scatter plot which can be found to the attached documents so it can be easier for me to illustrate if there is any correlation.
Also it is clearly visible on the predator graph that it is Exponential however the pray graph is not.

About the formula I was thinking of something like P = a.e^Inb.t

Note: the first graph shows very clearly that the word is "prey", not "pray".
 
Cryphisss said:

I am really confused at the moment since I do not know if there is any correlation, I have examined the two graphs and so far I don't think there is any correlation.


There clearly is a correlation. The number of predators follows the number prey with some ratio, and with a time lag (and maybe some other correction factors).

Try out a formula that shows the ratio of prey to predators (it's a ratio >1), and include some time lag in the function. Then calculate your overall error versus the graph, and see if you can adjust the ratio and time lag parameters to give you a good correlation. Then for whatever errors you still have, see if you can figure out smaller correction factors to put into the equation. For example, the seasons of the year may be a factor in their populations as well...
 
berkeman said:
There clearly is a correlation. The number of predators follows the number prey with some ratio, and with a time lag (and maybe some other correction factors).

Try out a formula that shows the ratio of prey to predators (it's a ratio >1), and include some time lag in the function. Then calculate your overall error versus the graph, and see if you can adjust the ratio and time lag parameters to give you a good correlation. Then for whatever errors you still have, see if you can figure out smaller correction factors to put into the equation. For example, the seasons of the year may be a factor in their populations as well...

Thanks for the reply, I'll try that. If it doesn't work out I will come back for more help!
 
How come you only included weeks 15-25 on the scatter plot? You should include all the data on the scatter plot, and you will see a much better correlation.

Chet
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
9K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
35K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K