How to derive coefficient of friction?

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the coefficient of static friction (μ_s) for a box at rest on an inclined plane at the critical angle. The correct formula is μ_s = tan(θ), as μ_s is dimensionless and cannot equal mgtan(θ). Participants emphasize the importance of drawing a free body diagram to visualize the forces at play, particularly in the limiting case where the box remains stationary. The gravitational force components are analyzed, leading to the conclusion that the teacher's reference to mgtan(θ) is incorrect. Overall, the key takeaway is that μ_s should be derived as tan(θ) for the scenario described.
Meteo
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
I have a box at rest on a plane raised to the critical angle.

I need to derive the formula \mu_s=mgtan(\theta)
I know f_s/n=\mu
n=f_y=mgcos(\theta)
f_s=f_x=mgsin(\theta)

This leaves me with tan(\theta)=\mu cause the mg cancel out... what did I do wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Meteo said:
I have a box at rest on a plane raised to the critical angle.

I need to derive the formula \mu_s=mgtan(\theta)
I know f_s/n=\mu
n=f_y=mgcos(\theta)
f_s=f_x=mgsin(\theta)

This leaves me with tan(\theta)=\mu cause the mg cancel out... what did I do wrong?
\mu_s is dimensionless so it cannot be equal to mgtan\theta. Your answer is correct.

AM
 
\mu_s=tan(\theta)
is what you are looking for

Draw a free body diagram.
This is only in the limiting case that it is the maximum \mu_x which will let the body rest on the incline of such an angle without sliding. So in this case you can use Friction=F_n*\mu
And set that equal to the component of the gravitational force pointing down the incline
 
Yes, that's what I managed to get. I think the mgtan(\theta) must be a mistake the teacher made since \mu cannot equal mgtan(\theta) because its dimensionless as AM said.
 
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 97 ·
4
Replies
97
Views
6K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K