How to Derive the Second Expression in @Peskin Eqn 2.54?

  • Thread starter Thread starter SuperStringboy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Peskin
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving the second expression in Peskin's Equation 2.54, specifically addressing the transformation of variables in integrals. The key point is that when changing the dummy variable from \( p \) to \( -p \), the measure \( d^3p \) does not change sign, which is crucial for maintaining the integrity of the equation. The participants clarify that this invariance is due to the properties of spherical coordinates in momentum space.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of integral calculus, particularly in three dimensions.
  • Familiarity with quantum field theory concepts, specifically Peskin's equations.
  • Knowledge of spherical coordinates and their application in physics.
  • Experience with variable substitution in integrals.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of integrals in three-dimensional momentum space.
  • Learn about the derivation and implications of Peskin's Equation 2.54.
  • Explore the concept of measure invariance in variable transformations.
  • Review spherical coordinates and their role in simplifying integrals in physics.
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in quantum field theory, physicists working with integrals in momentum space, and anyone looking to deepen their understanding of variable transformations in advanced mathematics.

SuperStringboy
Messages
74
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I am facing problem to derive the 2nd expression from the first one. My problem is the 2nd term of the 2nd expression.

Homework Equations


<br /> \int\frac{d^3p}{(2\pi)^3}\frac{1}{2E_p}[\exp(-ip\cdot(x - y)) - \exp(ip\cdot (x - y))]=\int\ \frac{d^3p} {(2\pi)^3}\ \{ \frac {1}{2E_p}\ e^{-ip.(x-y)}\left|_{p^0 = E_p}\ +\ \frac {1}{-2E_p}\ e^{-ip.(x-y)}\left|_{p^0 = -E_p}\ \}<br />

The Attempt at a Solution


<br /> p\cdot (x - y)= p^0(x^0 - y^0) - \textbf p\cdot(x-y)<br />

For Po = - Ep we can take
<br /> p\cdot (x - y)= - p^0(x^0 - y^0) - \textbf p\cdot(x-y)<br />
If i am not wrong yet, then what now?
should i change the dummy variable as p = - p? But if do it then i think another change comes d3p becomes -d3p for the 2nd term and i loose the minus sign before the 2nd term.

i don't know how much wrong i am but i am expecting good solution from you guys.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
SuperStringboy said:
If i am not wrong yet, then what now?
should i change the dummy variable as p = - p? But if do it then i thing another change comes d3p becomes -d3p for the 2nd term and i loose the minus sign before the 2nd term.

The trick is that the measure d3p actually does not change sign under p -> -p.
 
Thanks Ben . But will you please explain that why the sign of d3 does not change. Is it because of spherical co-ordinates : d3p = p2sin(theta)d(theta)d(phi)dp , where p = |p| ?
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K