How to Determine Currents in a Parallel Circuit with Different EMFs?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Scott.P
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Parallel
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

This discussion revolves around a problem related to DC circuits, specifically focusing on determining the currents in a parallel circuit with different electromotive forces (EMFs) and resistors. The original poster presents a set of equations derived from Kirchhoff's laws to analyze the circuit.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to apply Kirchhoff's loop and junction rules to set up equations for the circuit. Participants suggest isolating variables and substituting them into equations to simplify the problem. There is a discussion about the direction of currents and the potential confusion arising from it.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the original poster's equations, offering guidance on how to manipulate them for clarity. There is recognition of a potential misunderstanding regarding the assignment of current directions, and some participants question the validity of the original poster's assumptions about the answer key.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of the original poster's current health situation, which may be affecting their ability to solve the problem. Additionally, there is a discussion about the accuracy of the answer key provided for the problem, particularly regarding the voltage drop across one of the resistors.

Scott.P
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



This is a question from my problem set on DC circuits:

30) Determine the magnitudes and directions of the currents through each resistor. The batteries have emfs of E1 = 9.0V and E2 = 12.0V, and the resistors have values of R1 = 15Ω, R2 = 20Ω, and R3 = 30Ω.

2zs709y_th.png


Homework Equations



Kirchhoff two circuit laws:

Loop Rule - [itex]\Sigma[/itex] Changes in voltage around closed loop = 0
Junction Rule -> For any junction in a circuit, the current entering must equal the current leaving the junction
Ohm's law - V = IR

The Attempt at a Solution



Go around the top loop, use the loop rule. Assume current goes clockwise for both loops. Define I1 to be the current through R1, I2 to be the current through R2, and I3 to be the current through R3:

9.0V - (15Ω)(I1) - (20Ω)(I2) = 0

Go around the bottom loop, with the same assumptions as stated:

12.0V - (30Ω)(I3) - (20Ω)(I2) = 0

And, from the junction rule,

I2 = I1 + I3

So, it appears we have three variables and three equations. Just solve the system of equations right? While it may look simple, I've been struggling to solve the system for the past hour, going through several sheets of paper. I don't know what it is, if I am missing something or if I made an error forming my equations. I am currently taking T3's for a fractured patella, but I don't think they have that much of an effect on my cognitive ability. Any help?

-Scott
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Hi Scott! Welcome to PF! :smile:
Scott.P said:
9.0V - (15Ω)(I1) - (20Ω)(I2) = 0

12.0V - (30Ω)(I3) - (20Ω)(I2) = 0

I2 = I1 + I3

substitute for I3 in the second equation

you now have two equations with only I1 and I2 :wink:
 
Your equations are correct. Isolate I1 from the first one and I3 from the second one and substitute the expressions for I1 and I3 into the third equation.
 


tiny-tim said:
Hi Scott! Welcome to PF! :smile:


substitute for I3 in the second equation

you now have two equations with only I1 and I2 :wink:

Well, no wonder I was having problems seeing the answer, I was trying to make equation one equal equation two and then substitute something in with equation three. Thanks.
 
I got an answer but it is different from that of the answer key. All of the numbers I gave are as the question says, but I believe the answer key is wrong, because they said that the voltage drop over R3 is I2R3, rather than I3R3as it should be. The mistake is repeated in the next question, which is identical to this except that the two emf's now have an internal resistance of 1Ohm. Am I right or the textbook?
 
hmm … looking again, your equations seem wrong …
Scott.P said:
Assume current goes clockwise for both loops.

… that makes no sense, you have to assign a direction for each of the three currents separately

(and mark them on your diagram with arrows, to make sure you don't make a mistake later)
 
tiny-tim said:
hmm … looking again, your equations seem wrong …


… that makes no sense, you have to assign a direction for each of the three currents separately

(and mark them on your diagram with arrows, to make sure you don't make a mistake later)

That would be my blunder for not putting the current direction on my diagram. I mixed myself up, I think I meant "going clockwise around each closed loop for the loop rule". On my paper here anyhow, I have chosen that I1 goes right (across R1); I2 goes left (across R2); and that I3 goes up (across R3).

Is that clear now?
 
oh, that's ok then :smile:
Scott.P said:
… I believe the answer key is wrong, because they said that the voltage drop over R3 is I2R3, rather than I3R3as it should be.

yes, the voltage drop over R3 is definitely R3 times the current through R3
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K