How to determine deflection of a cantilevered plate with a radius?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Chris3C
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Deflection Plate
AI Thread Summary
To determine the deflection of a cantilevered plate with a radius, consider the material thickness and potential buckling in the most compressed section. The material thickness is specified as 2 inches, and the radius helps prevent tension failure at tight corners. Computing deflection without the radius will yield a slight overestimate. The vertical section's dimensions, which are not detailed, are crucial for accurate deflection calculations and depend on the cantilever's support conditions. Understanding these factors is essential for precise deflection assessment.
Chris3C
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
I'm trying to determine how much deflection would occur in a A36 steel plate with a cantilevered end supported by a 2" radius. I can only find equations that use a moment of inertia that is static throughout the cantilevered feature length.
Screenshot 2024-06-28 092837.png
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Welcome, Chris!
In this case you have a hook type of problem, to solve which you will need to consider the thickness of the material and the potential buckling of the section being most compressed.
 
Lnewqban said:
Welcome, Chris!
In this case you have a hook type of problem, to solve which you will need to consider the thickness of the material and the potential buckling of the section being most compressed.
Hello! In this case the thickness of the material is 2".
 
The radius section is there to prevent tension failure where stress is focused on the inside of the otherwise tight corner.

Compute the deflection assuming the radius section is missing. That will give a slight overestimate of the deflection.

The vertical section, not shown, is less than the horizontal. Deflection may be determined by the vertical section, but that will depend on how the cantilever is supported, which is also not shown.
 
Here's a video by “driving 4 answers” who seems to me to be well versed on the details of Internal Combustion engines. The video does cover something that's a bit shrouded in 'conspiracy theory', and he touches on that, but of course for phys.org, I'm only interested in the actual science involved. He analyzes the claim of achieving 100 mpg with a 427 cubic inch V8 1970 Ford Galaxy in 1977. Only the fuel supply system was modified. I was surprised that he feels the claim could have been...
Thread 'Turbocharging carbureted petrol 2 stroke engines'
Hi everyone, online I ve seen some images about 2 stroke carbureted turbo (motorcycle derivation engine). Now.. In the past in this forum some members spoke about turbocharging 2 stroke but not in sufficient detail. The intake and the exhaust are open at the same time and there are no valves like a 4 stroke. But if you search online you can find carbureted 2stroke turbo sled or the Am6 turbo. The question is: Is really possible turbocharge a 2 stroke carburated(NOT EFI)petrol engine and...
Back
Top