Solving for Bending Stress and Deflection in a Cantilever Plate

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving for bending stress and deflection in a cantilever plate subjected to a uniformly distributed load (UDL). Key formulas derived from the Polish book "Collection of tasks on strength of materials" by Banasiak, Grossman, and Trombski are presented, including maximum bending stress equations: $$\sigma_{x \ max}=\frac{3qa^{2}}{h^{2}}$$ and $$w_{max}=\frac{3 (1- \nu^{2})qa^{4}}{2 E h^{3}}$$. The results align closely with Finite Element Analysis (FEA), demonstrating a more accurate approach than treating the plate as a beam. Boundary conditions for the solution are specified, ensuring proper constraints at the fixed edge of the plate.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of bending stress and deflection concepts in structural engineering
  • Familiarity with uniformly distributed loads (UDL)
  • Knowledge of boundary conditions in plate theory
  • Basic proficiency in Finite Element Analysis (FEA)
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of bending stress formulas in "Collection of tasks on strength of materials" by Banasiak, Grossman, and Trombski
  • Learn about boundary conditions in plate theory and their implications on structural analysis
  • Explore advanced methods for solving plate problems, such as trigonometric series
  • Investigate the application of Finite Element Analysis (FEA) in evaluating cantilever plate behavior under UDL
USEFUL FOR

Structural engineers, mechanical engineers, and students specializing in materials science or structural analysis will benefit from this discussion, particularly those focused on the analysis of cantilever plates and stress evaluation under loading conditions.

FEAnalyst
Messages
348
Reaction score
149
TL;DR
How to calculate stress and deflection of a cantilever plate analytically ?
Hi,

books such as „Roark’s Formulas for Stress and Strain” or Timoshenko’s „Theory of plates and shells” provide formulas for maximum bending stress and deflection for many cases of rectangular plates. However, I can’t find a simple case of a cantilever plate (one edge clamped, all other edges free) subjected to UDL anywhere. The closest example is a plate with one edge clamped and all other edges simply supported (from Timoshenko’s book) but it’s not the same. There must be a way to solve this problem of a shelf-like plate analytically. Do you know where I can find appropriate formulas ?

Thanks in advance for your help
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
UDL??
 
This is a pretty tricky problem because of the lateral constraint of the plate at the clamping. If it were allowed to slide laterally, that would make it much easier. I'm sure that, somewhere in the literature, this problem (more complex version) has been solved, but I have never researched it.
 
Dr.D said:
UDL??

What I mean is uniformly distributed load.

Chestermiller said:
This is a pretty tricky problem because of the lateral constraint of the plate at the clamping. If it were allowed to slide laterally, that would make it much easier. I'm sure that, somewhere in the literature, this problem (more complex version) has been solved, but I have never researched it.

Thanks. I noticed that this problem is much more complex than it seems. I know that such plate can be treated as a beam but it's not very accurate approach. Maybe it's possible to solve this case using trigonometric series or other complex method but I'm not sure how to do it.
 
I've found a solution in a Polish book "Collection of tasks on strength of materials" by Banasiak, Grossman and Trombski. This book features a derivation and the final equations are: $$\displaystyle{ \sigma_{x \ max}=\frac{3qa^{2}}{h^{2}}}$$ $$\displaystyle{ \sigma_{y \ max}=\nu \cdot \frac{3qa^{2}}{h^{2}}}$$ $$\displaystyle{ \sigma_{vM \ max}=\frac{3qa^{2}}{h^{2}} \cdot \sqrt{1+ \nu^{2}- \nu}}$$ $$\displaystyle{ w_{max}=\frac{3 (1- \nu^{2})qa^{4}}{2 E h^{3}}}$$
where: ##q## - magnitude of uniformly distributed load, ##a## - length of the plate (from fixed to free end), ##h## - thickness of the plate.
The results are in very good agreement with FEA (much better than when the plate is treated as a beam).
 
FEAnalyst said:
I've found a solution in a Polish book "Collection of tasks on strength of materials" by Banasiak, Grossman and Trombski. This book features a derivation and the final equations are: $$\displaystyle{ \sigma_{x \ max}=\frac{3qa^{2}}{h^{2}}}$$ $$\displaystyle{ \sigma_{y \ max}=\nu \cdot \frac{3qa^{2}}{h^{2}}}$$ $$\displaystyle{ \sigma_{vM \ max}=\frac{3qa^{2}}{h^{2}} \cdot \sqrt{1+ \nu^{2}- \nu}}$$ $$\displaystyle{ w_{max}=\frac{3 (1- \nu^{2})qa^{4}}{2 E h^{3}}}$$
where: ##q## - magnitude of uniformly distributed load, ##a## - length of the plate (from fixed to free end), ##h## - thickness of the plate.
The results are in very good agreement with FEA (much better than when the plate is treated as a beam).
What are the edge boundary conditions for this solution?
 
Chestermiller said:
What are the edge boundary conditions for this solution?
One edge of the plate is fixed, the remaining ones are free:
C8AC7C35-F9C6-4B16-B26B-E0BA7B559E08.jpeg
 
FEAnalyst said:
One edge of the plate is fixed, the remaining ones are free:
View attachment 291921
On the constrained edge, is it constrained transversely so that the strains in the y direction are zero at this boundary?
 
Chestermiller said:
On the constrained edge, is it constrained transversely so that the strains in the y direction are zero at this boundary?
The boundary conditions are given in the book as follows: $$w_{x=a}=0$$ $$\varphi_{x=a}=\left( \frac{dw}{dx} \right)_{x=a}=0$$ $$t_{x=0}=-D \left( \frac{d^{3}w}{dx^{3}} \right)_{x=0}=0$$ $$\left( m_{y} \right)_{x=0}=-D \left( \frac{d^{2}w}{dx^{2}} \right)_{x=0}=0$$
where: ##t## - shear force, ##m## - bending moment.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
4K