How to determine if a binary relation R on M is a bisimulation?

  • Thread starter Dragonfall
  • Start date
1,028
4
Let M be a system (possibly proper class-sized directed graph where the class of children of a given node is a set). A binary relation R on M is a BISIMULATION if [tex]R\subset R'[/tex], where for [tex]a, b\in M[/tex]

[tex]aR'b \Leftrightarrow ((\forall x \in a_M\exists y\in b_M xRy) \wedge (\forall x \in b_M\exists y\in a_M xRy))[/tex]

where [tex]a_M[/tex] is the set of children of a in M.

So let ~ be the relation on the class of all sets V such that a~b iff there exists an accessible pointed graph that is the picture of both a and b.

An accessible pointed graph is a directed graph with a distinguished node from where every other node is connected by a path.

Show that ~ is a bisimulation.

I'm not sure what bisimulation says. Can someone explain it in more familiar terms?
 
1,028
4
The wording above (quoted from the book) is very bad. It took me a long time to understand that R is a bisimulation if R is contained in the ' operation.
 

Physics Forums Values

We Value Quality
• Topics based on mainstream science
• Proper English grammar and spelling
We Value Civility
• Positive and compassionate attitudes
• Patience while debating
We Value Productivity
• Disciplined to remain on-topic
• Recognition of own weaknesses
• Solo and co-op problem solving
Top