How to determine parabolic object.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Thundagere
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
To determine if an object resembles a parabola, one can measure its parameters and mark points to derive an equation based on the standard form of a paraboloid. Using reflective properties, lasers can be shot parallel to the rotational axis to see if they converge at a focal point, indicating a true paraboloid shape. For calculating the area of the object, measuring the density and thickness, then weighing the object provides a straightforward method. The discussion highlights that deriving coordinates and fitting an equation manually can be complex and prone to errors. Overall, practical measurement techniques can effectively assess the parabolic nature of an object.
Thundagere
Messages
159
Reaction score
0
This is more of an mathematics application question than anything, but.
Let's say I'm building a satellite or some sort of focusing device. I obviously need a parabola. If I have an object that resembles a parabola—for example, a pot of some sort—how can I determine that's it's in reality a parabola, and not just a random shape?
Also, what would I need to do to find the area inside of that pot?
Thanks.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You mean a paraboloid?

It should have the following equation

f(x,y) = a(x - x_0)^2 + b(y - y_0)^2 + k
 
Yep.
So I would measure out it's parameters, and say, mark a point as the origin? Then (let's assume inches instead of cm), mark another point on the edge and find it's coordinates? Would I keep doing that until I had an equation, then plug in values and make sure it fit roughly?
 
You're saying you actually have an aluminum object in real life whose paraboloidness you wish to determine? Assuming it's reflective you can shoot lasers parallel to the rotational axis and they all should pass through a point... so you could try pointing a bunch simultaneously around the edges, hold up a sheet in the middle and see what kind of spread you get as you move it back and forth. This would also just tell you how close to a focusing device you've actually constructed.

To get the area I would just find the density of the material, measure the thickness (assuming it's uniform) and weigh the thing. No need to be fancy if you don't have to be

Trying to measure a set of points and get relative coordinates, followed by finding a best fit equation and margin of error seems like a pretty difficult and error prone method especially if you're doing it by hand
 
Here is a little puzzle from the book 100 Geometric Games by Pierre Berloquin. The side of a small square is one meter long and the side of a larger square one and a half meters long. One vertex of the large square is at the center of the small square. The side of the large square cuts two sides of the small square into one- third parts and two-thirds parts. What is the area where the squares overlap?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
9K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K