How to Determine Plate Configuration in Capacitance Calculations?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the configuration of capacitor plates in a capacitance calculation problem. Participants are exploring the relationships between electric field, energy density, and total energy in a system with multiple segments.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the charge distribution and electric field lines, questioning how to determine if the plates are connected in series or parallel. There are attempts to relate energy and capacitance, with some participants expressing confusion about the definitions and relationships involved.

Discussion Status

There is ongoing exploration of the relationships between energy, capacitance, and electric field. Some participants have provided insights into the total energy of the system and its implications for capacitance configuration, while others are still seeking clarity on specific terms and concepts.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of a homework assignment, which may limit the information available or the methods they can use to analyze the problem. There is a focus on understanding the implications of the configuration of the capacitor plates.

Arman777
Insights Author
Gold Member
Messages
2,163
Reaction score
191

Homework Statement


In attachments
Adsız 1.png


Homework Equations




The Attempt at a Solution


K.png
This is my charge distrubition.From there I draw electric field lines.And then from potential difference I wrote
##E=\frac {V} {d}## and then ##υ=\frac 1 2ε_0E^2## then ##U=\frac {CV^2}{2}##

I am doing something wrong..I guess I should decide to Are these plates connected in parallel or in series ? But I don't know how to decide that

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Arman777 said:
This is my charge distrubition.From there I draw electric field lines.And then from potential difference I wrote
##E=\frac {V} {d}## and then ##υ=\frac 1 2ε_0E^2## then ##U=\frac {CV^2}{2}##

I am doing something wrong..
So far, I don't see anything wrong. What did you do from this point?

I guess I should decide to Are these plates connected in parallel or in series ? But I don't know how to decide that
Using the approach of this problem, you do not need to decide whether the plates are in parallel or in series. Your answer will tell you if the plates are in series or parallel.
 
Which part are you working on?

You have a relation between U and C, but you have to determine both.
Arman777 said:
I am doing something wrong..I guess I should decide to Are these plates connected in parallel or in series ? But I don't know how to decide that
In the same way you determine it for every circuit, but you don't necessarily have to determine that.
 
TSny said:
So far, I don't see anything wrong. What did you do from this point?

Welli I found (a) and it is ##E=\frac {V} {d}## then Energy density will be ##υ=\frac 1 2ε_0E^2## .
I am stucked here I wrote for (b) ##U=\frac {CV^2}{2}## but I don't know what's the "U".Its like saying ##U=U## (I found like this) Thats why something seemes wrong.

mfb said:
You have a relation between U and C, but you have to determine both.

Thats where I am stucked I think here ##E## will be different then ##\frac {V} {d}## otherwise as I said it becomes ##U=U## and ##C=C## which sounds nonsense in some sense
 
Or its U=3U cause there's 3 segments ? The sum of energy of plates ?
 
Arman777 said:
Welli I found (a) and it is ##E=\frac {V} {d}## then Energy density will be ##υ=\frac 1 2ε_0E^2## .
I am stucked here I wrote for (b) ##U=\frac {CV^2}{2}## but I don't know what's the "U".Its like saying ##U=U## (I found like this) Thats why something seemes wrong.
How would you express the total U of the system in terms of electric field energy?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: mfb
Arman777 said:
Or its U=3U cause there's 3 segments ? The sum of energy of plates ?
Something cannot be 3 times itself (unless it is 0 - it is not).
See TSny's post for a good hint.
 
mfb said:
Something cannot be 3 times itself (unless it is 0 - it is not).

TSny said:
How would you express the total U of the system in terms of electric field energy?

Not like that I meant ##U_{tot}=3U=3(Ad)υ=3(Ad)\frac 1 2 ε_0E^2=\frac {3CV^2} {2}##
 
Arman777 said:
##U_{tot}=3U=3(Ad)υ=3(Ad)\frac 1 2 ε_0E^2##
That part is fine.
##=\frac{3CV^2}{2}##
That would need a "capacitance per layer" or something like that. Don't do that.
You have the total energy, you know the voltage, that is sufficient to determine the total capacitance.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Arman777
  • #10
mfb said:
That part is fine.
That would need a "capacitance per layer" or something like that. Don't do that.
You have the total energy, you know the voltage, that is sufficient to determine the total capacitance.

##C_{tot}=3ε_0 \frac A d## ?
 
  • #11
Arman777 said:
##C_{tot}=3ε_0 \frac A d## ?
Yes. But I can't tell how you got that.
 
  • #12
TSny said:
Yes. But I can't tell how you got that.

##3(Ad)\frac 1 2 ε_0E^2=\frac {CV^2} {2}## and ##E=\frac V d##
 
  • #13
Arman777 said:
##3(Ad)\frac 1 2 ε_0E^2=\frac {CV^2} {2}##
OK.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Arman777
  • #14
Thanks
 
  • #15
Can you tell from your answer if the three gaps in the system act like capacitors in series or do they act like capacitors in parallel?
 
  • #16
TSny said:
Can you tell from your answer if the three gaps in the system act like capacitors in series or do they act like capacitors in parallel?
parallel
 
  • #17
Right.

Another way to see this: All three gaps have the same electrodes.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K