How to Determine Standard Enthalpy Change Using Hess's Law?

  • Thread starter Thread starter nobb
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Law Tips
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The standard enthalpy change for the production of hydrogen from methane and steam, represented by the reaction CH4(g) + H2O(g) -> CO(g) + 3H2(g), can be determined using Hess's Law by manipulating specific chemical equations. Key reactions include 2C(s) + O2(g) -> 2CO(g) (Hc= -221.0 kJ), CH4(g) + 2O2(g) -> CO2(g) + 2H2O(g) (Hc= -802.7 kJ), and CO(g) + H2O(g) -> CO2(g) + H2(g) (Hr= -41.2 kJ). By strategically switching and adding these equations, the standard enthalpy change can be calculated as approximately 205.7 kJ.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Hess's Law
  • Familiarity with standard enthalpy of formation and combustion
  • Knowledge of manipulating chemical equations
  • Basic thermodynamics concepts
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Hess's Law applications in thermodynamics
  • Learn how to calculate standard enthalpy changes using multiple reactions
  • Explore the concept of enthalpy of formation and its significance
  • Practice manipulating chemical equations for enthalpy calculations
USEFUL FOR

Chemistry students, chemical engineers, and professionals involved in thermodynamics and reaction energetics will benefit from this discussion.

nobb
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
Hey. I am having trouble with this question:

What is the standard enthalpy change for the production of hydrogen from methane and steam: CH4(g) + H2O(g) -> CO(g) + 3H2(g)

2C(s) + O2(g) -> 2CO(g) Hc= -221.0 kJ
CH4(g) + 2O2(g) -> CO2(g) + 2H2O(g) Hc= -802.7 kJ
CO(g) + H2O(g) -> CO2(g) + H2(g) Hr= -41.2 kJ
2H2(g) + O2(g) -> 2H2O(g) Hc= -483.6 kJ
C(s) + 2H2(g) -> CH4(g) Hf= -74.4 kJ
C(s) + H2O(g) -> CO(g) + H2(g) Hr= 131.3 kJ
2CO(g) + O2(g) -> 2CO2(g) Hc= -566.0 kJ
CO(g) + H2(g) + O2(g) -> CO2(g) + H2O(g) Hr= -524.8 kJ

This question is really complex and I do not know which equations to switch. I don't really know where to start. Could someone please offer some tips on how to do this question and others?
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Add all reactions to one another to obtain the final (desired) one. Remember that switching a reaction from left to right also changes its sign; if it is negative, treat this as a positive one.
 
Yes I know that. I am confused because I do not know which ones to switch. I tried this question many times and I still can't get the answer
 
Switch #5 and add with #6. You'll find a value about 208 kJ.
 
Actually, they have provided more reactions than you need. That's what makes it look complex, while in fact, the problem can be solved easily using only 3 of the above equations.

2C(s) + O2(g) -> 2CO(g) Hc= -221.0 kJ
CH4(g) + 2O2(g) -> CO2(g) + 2H2O(g) Hc= -802.7 kJ
CO(g) + H2O(g) -> CO2(g) + H2(g) Hr= -41.2 kJ
2H2(g) + O2(g) -> 2H2O(g) Hc= -483.6 kJ
C(s) + 2H2(g) -> CH4(g) Hf= -74.4 kJ
C(s) + H2O(g) -> CO(g) + H2(g) Hr= 131.3 kJ
2CO(g) + O2(g) -> 2CO2(g) Hc= -566.0 kJ
CO(g) + H2(g) + O2(g) -> CO2(g) + H2O(g) Hr= -524.8 kJ

Remember, there are probably several ways to solve this using any number of the given equations. It may even be possible to use them all, but I'm certainly not going to try that when I've found a simpler way.

Look at the bolded equations and figure out how to manipulate them to get the desired result.

Having done this, try to come up with at least one other alternative route (there's one using only 2 equations). If you do these two things, you'll have little trouble with such problems in the future.

Edit : chem_tr has given away the simpler solution too, so try and look for a third one : I get 205.7 kJ, both ways.
 
Last edited:
Ok thanks. That makes much more sense now.
 
I came.across a headline and read some of the article, so I was curious. Scientists discover that gold is a 'reactive metal' by accidentally creating a new material in the lab https://www.earth.com/news/discovery-that-gold-is-reactive-metal-by-creating-gold-hydride-in-lab-experiment/ From SLAC - A SLAC team unexpectedly formed gold hydride in an experiment that could pave the way for studying materials under extreme conditions like those found inside certain planets and stars undergoing...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
27K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
28K
Replies
8
Views
8K