How to Differentiate a Complex Function: Tips and Tricks for Success

  • Thread starter Thread starter Millacol88
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Derivative
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around differentiating a complex function involving terms with constants, variables, and fractions. The function includes products and quotients, leading to challenges in applying differentiation rules correctly.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss attempts to simplify the function before differentiation, including distributing terms and checking equivalence using a graphing calculator. There are mentions of using product and quotient rules, as well as the power rule for differentiation. Questions arise regarding potential algebra mistakes and the correctness of derived expressions.

Discussion Status

Several participants are actively engaging in checking each other's work and clarifying steps in the differentiation process. There are indications of productive dialogue, with some participants suggesting re-evaluations of terms and methods used. However, no explicit consensus has been reached regarding the correct derivative.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the presence of local minima in the original function and discrepancies in the derived expressions. There are also references to specific numerical values and potential errors in calculations that are being scrutinized.

Millacol88
Messages
86
Reaction score
0
Does somebody want to help me with differentiating this function:

(0.003 + 0.004[itex]\sqrt{2}[/itex])∏r2 + 0.004∏r [(2250 - ∏r3) / 3∏r2)]

Originally I tried simplifying it by distributing the 0.004∏r into the fraction, but whenever I did that the two expressions were never equivalent when I checked them on a graphing calculator. Then I tried using the product and quotient rules to differentiate the second term and the power rule for the first, but based on the graph that was not the correct derivative. I found that the derivative had only one zero at -1 which doesn't make sense because the original function clearly has a local minimum at around x = 4. Any help is appreciated, this is really bugging me. :s
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Millacol88 said:
Does somebody want to help me with differentiating this function:

(0.003 + 0.004[itex]\sqrt{2}[/itex])∏r2 + 0.004∏r [(2250 - ∏r3) / 3∏r2)]

Originally I tried simplifying it by distributing the 0.004∏r into the fraction, but whenever I did that the two expressions were never equivalent when I checked them on a graphing calculator. Then I tried using the product and quotient rules to differentiate the second term and the power rule for the first, but based on the graph that was not the correct derivative. I found that the derivative had only one zero at -1 which doesn't make sense because the original function clearly has a local minimum at around x = 4. Any help is appreciated, this is really bugging me. :s
What did you get for your function when you did the following?
Originally I tried simplifying it by distributing the 0.004∏r into the fraction, but ...
 
Are you sure there wasn't an algebra mistake? Be sure to double check your signs, a missed negative sign can be disasterous. Also double check your powers.

Did you notice that after the plus sign, the pi and r cancel with the pi and one r in the denominator? Makes it so you only need to use the quotient rule in the second term.

Before differentiation, it simplifies to: N*r^2 - M*r +L*(1/r) where N, M, and L are just numbers.
 
After simplifying I get:
(0.003 + 0.004√2) ∏r2 + 3/r - (4∏r2) / 300

Which is equivalent now according to a graphing calculator.

Differentiating, I get:
(0.006 + 0.008√2) ∏r - 3r-2 - 1500/∏r3

But that's not right. i.e. it has positive values when the slope of the function is negative. :/
 
Sorry, I missed an r in my earlier calculation...
 
Yeah I noticed. No worries. :-p Do you know what's wrong with the derivative. I found just with the power rule and the quotient rule on the last term.
 
Where did you get that 4/300 from? Shouldn't it be 1/750?

The 4/300 has a decimal expansion of 0.01333333... and the 1/750 is 0.0013333... I think you missed a zero. :)
 
I typed that wrong, I did get 4/3000 (1/750).
 
Ok...that makes sense. :) Where is that 1/r^3 coming from in your derivative?
 
  • #10
Using the quotient rule on the 4∏r2 / 3000 term. The denominator of the differentiated expression is 16∏2r4. A pi and an r cancel from the numerator which was 8∏r(3000).
 
  • #11
Quotient rule? You have the first two terms in the derivative right...the r and r^-2 terms...but the last one -1500/(pi*r^3) is wrong. That term should be your -8*pi*r/3000. You shouldn't need the quotient rule at all, just the power rule.
 
  • #12
Millacol88 said:
Does somebody want to help me with differentiating this function:

(0.003 + 0.004[itex]\sqrt{2}[/itex])∏r2 + 0.004∏r [(2250 - ∏r3) / 3∏r2)]

Originally I tried simplifying it by distributing the 0.004∏r into the fraction, but whenever I did that the two expressions were never equivalent when I checked them on a graphing calculator. Then I tried using the product and quotient rules to differentiate the second term and the power rule for the first, but based on the graph that was not the correct derivative. I found that the derivative had only one zero at -1 which doesn't make sense because the original function clearly has a local minimum at around x = 4. Any help is appreciated, this is really bugging me. :s

Millacol88 said:
After simplifying I get:
(0.003 + 0.004√2) ∏r2 + 3/r - (4∏r2) / 300

Which is equivalent now according to a graphing calculator.

Differentiating, I get:
(0.006 + 0.008√2) ∏r - 3r-2 - 1500/∏r3

But that's not right. i.e. it has positive values when the slope of the function is negative. :/
It looks like you forgot to multiply by 0.004 .
 
  • #13
SammyS said:
It looks like you forgot to multiply by 0.004 .

No, I multiplied that in at the very beginning. I scaled up the fraction by 1000 times so I had a 4 in the numerator rather than a decimal. After fixing what Reptilian mentioned, my derivative looks correct, and the zero is at the x-value of that local minimum, so I think it's right.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K