How to do this logarithm proof

  • Thread starter Thread starter davedave
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Logarithm Proof
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on proving the equation L + M + N = LMN - 2, where L, M, and N are logarithmic expressions defined as L = logx(yz), M = logy(xz), and N = logz(xy). The user attempts to manipulate these logarithmic identities into exponential form and combine them to derive the desired proof. The key steps involve raising the equations to specific powers and rearranging terms to facilitate the proof's completion.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of logarithmic identities and properties
  • Familiarity with exponential functions and their manipulation
  • Basic knowledge of algebraic rearrangement techniques
  • Experience with mathematical proofs and logical reasoning
NEXT STEPS
  • Study logarithmic identities and their applications in proofs
  • Learn about the properties of exponents and their manipulation
  • Explore advanced algebraic techniques for combining equations
  • Practice constructing mathematical proofs in algebra and calculus
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, educators, and anyone interested in enhancing their understanding of logarithmic functions and proof techniques.

davedave
Messages
50
Reaction score
0
This is not a homework question. I just try it for enjoyment.

Let L = log to the base x of (yz) M = log to the base y of (xz) and
N = log to the base z of (xy)

This is how I do it without much luck.

I put all the equations in exponential form

yz = x^L xz = y^M xy = z^N

raise the right-hand sides of the equations to the required power so that x y z will have a product of LMN in the exponent.

(yz)^(MN) = x^(LMN) (xz)^(LN) = y^(LMN) (xy)^(LM) = z^(LMN)


combining the equations gives (yz)^(MN) * (xz)^(LN) * (xy)^(LM) = (xyz)^(LMN)

now, multiply both sides of the equation to (xyz)^-2 and rearrange the terms

x^(L(M+N)-2) * y^(M(L+N)-2) * z^(N(L+M)-2) = (xyz)^(LMN-2)

But, if I could make the left side of the equation above into (xyz)^(L+M+N), then that would complete the proof.

Can someone think of any other way of doing this proof? Thanks.

sorry about my omission.

Here is the question.

Prove that L + M + N = LMN - 2
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
What exactly is the proof you are looking to do?
 
The equation x^L = y*z gives L = ln(y*z)/ln(x) = [ln(y) + ln(z)]/ln(x), etc.

RGV
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K