How to do this surface integral

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around evaluating a surface integral, with participants expressing confusion about the complexity of the integral when projected onto different planes (xz or yz). The problem involves substitution and integration techniques, and participants are exploring the implications of their approaches.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the use of substitution to simplify the integral and question the correctness of the original integral setup. There are attempts to evaluate the integral and concerns about the complexity of the resulting expressions.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered guidance on substitution methods and have pointed out that the integral may not be as difficult as it appears. There is ongoing exploration of the integral's evaluation, with participants seeking clarification on potential errors in their approaches.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention the context of the problem being from an old final exam, raising concerns about the appropriateness of the integral's complexity for a test situation. There is also a reference to the use of computational tools for solving integrals, which some participants feel detracts from the challenge.

jegues
Messages
1,085
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement



See figure attached for problem statement.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



See figure attached for my attempt so far.

I'm confused as to how to do this problem. Either plane I project the surface into (xz or yz) the integral looks pretty nasty.

Any ideas?
 

Attachments

  • 2009Q2.jpg
    2009Q2.jpg
    38.5 KB · Views: 484
Physics news on Phys.org
I think it just looks worse than it really is. Try using the substitution u=4x2+1.

I should point out I'm assuming the integral you got is correct. I don't remember this stuff off the top of my head, so if there is an error, I hope someone chimes into correct us both!
 
vela said:
I think it just looks worse than it really is. Try using the substitution u=4x2+1.

I should point out I'm assuming the integral you got is correct. I don't remember this stuff off the top of my head, so if there is an error, I hope someone chimes into correct us both!

If I apply that substitution,

[tex]\frac{1}{8} \int_{0} ^{2} \int_{1} ^{17} (4 + \frac{1-u}{4}) \sqrt{u}du dz[/tex]

Simplifying,

[tex]\frac{1}{32} \int_{0} ^{2} \int_{1} ^{17} (17u^{\frac{1}{2}}-u^{\frac{3}{2}})dudz[/tex]

It doesn't look like it's getting much better unless I've made a mistake.
 
jegues said:
I'm confused as to how to do this problem. Either plane I project the surface into (xz or yz) the integral looks pretty nasty.

Any ideas?

Your integral looks right, although I'd replace dA with dxdz.

To solve "nasty" integrals we have computers nowadays, or more specifically websites.
It does take the challenge away though :frown:.

See: http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=integral+from+0+to+2%3A+x%284-x^2%29sqrt%281%2B4x^2%29+dx

Where you can find:

[tex]\int_0^2 x (4-x^2) \sqrt{1+4 x^2} dx = 1/120 (289 \sqrt 17-41) \approx 9.58815[/tex]

Of course, this still needs to be integrated over z...

[EDIT]Btw, the last integral is not that difficult with e.g.:

[tex]\int x^{\frac 3 2} dx = \frac 2 5 x^{\frac 5 2} + c[/tex]

[/EDIT]
 
I like Serena said:
Your integral looks right, although I'd replace dA with dxdz.

To solve "nasty" integrals we have computers nowadays, or more specifically websites.
It does take the challenge away though :frown:.

See: http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=integral+from+0+to+2%3A+x%284-x^2%29sqrt%281%2B4x^2%29+dx

Where you can find:

[tex]\int_0^2 x (4-x^2) \sqrt{1+4 x^2} dx = 1/120 (289 \sqrt 17-41) \approx 9.58815[/tex]

Of course, this still needs to be integrated over z...

[EDIT]Btw, the last integral is not that difficult with e.g.:

[tex]\int x^{\frac 3 2} dx = \frac 2 5 x^{\frac 5 2} + c[/tex]

[/EDIT]

Well I hope I've made a mistake then because I am supposed to be able to do questions of this difficulty in a test situation without the use of a calculator, let alone a computer.

Can someone see where I went wrong? Or a cleaner way of doing this?

Thanks again!
 
jegues said:
[tex]\frac{1}{32} \int_{0}^{2} \int_{1}^{17} (17u^{\frac{1}{2}}-u^{\frac{3}{2}})dudz[/tex]

It doesn't look like it's getting much better unless I've made a mistake.
I think you're missing the obvious here. That integral is straightforward to evaluate.

What are

[tex]\int u^{1/2}\,du[/tex]

and

[tex]\int u^{3/2}\,du[/tex]

equal to?
 
vela said:
I think you're missing the obvious here. That integral is straightforward to evaluate.

What are

[tex]\int u^{1/2}\,du[/tex]

and

[tex]\int u^{3/2}\,du[/tex]

equal to?

I know how to that do that I just don't think we would be given a question were we have ugly numbers like,

[tex]17^{\frac{5}{2}}[/tex]

etc, as the answer, this question was from an old final exam and it's not like the professors to do that.
 
jegues said:
I know how to that do that I just don't think we would be given a question were we have ugly numbers like,

[tex]17^{\frac{5}{2}}[/tex]

etc, as the answer, this question was from an old final exam and it's not like the professors to do that.

Really? I think that number is kind of pretty. I know professors that have given problems with answers like that on exams.:redface:
 
LCKurtz said:
Really? I think that number is kind of pretty. I know professors that have given problems with answers like that on exams.:redface:


So there's no mistakes in my original integral than? Vela said that he had skipped over that part so I'd like to make sure that what I'm doing is indeed correct.

Can you spot any errors?
 
  • #10
jegues said:
So there's no mistakes in my original integral than? Vela said that he had skipped over that part so I'd like to make sure that what I'm doing is indeed correct.

Can you spot any errors?

Your original xz integral is set up correctly. And the number 175/2 does appear in the answer, although that particular term might be simplified to 289*sqrt(17).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K