How to ensure maximum possible joint torque for an actuator?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on optimizing the placement of a linear actuator on a joint system to achieve maximum joint torque with a mechanical advantage of 1. The actuator must be fixed to a stationary arm while remaining close to the moving arm, which complicates the torque generation due to the limited perpendicular distance to the pivot. Participants clarify that the constraints presented are more about optimization rather than strict limitations, emphasizing the need for a clear understanding of the mechanical setup to effectively address the torque issue.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of mechanical advantage in actuator systems
  • Knowledge of torque calculations and pivot mechanics
  • Familiarity with linear actuators and their applications
  • Basic principles of joint systems in mechanical engineering
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of mechanical advantage in actuator placement
  • Study torque generation and its dependence on pivot distances
  • Explore optimization techniques for actuator positioning in joint systems
  • Learn about the design considerations for linear actuators in mechanical applications
USEFUL FOR

Mechanical engineers, robotics designers, and anyone involved in optimizing actuator systems for joint torque applications will benefit from this discussion.

TheShermanTanker
Messages
13
Reaction score
4
Below, I have a joint system that consists of a fixed anchor and a moving arm:
2020-05-08.png


What I want is simple: To attach a linear actuator on the moving arm in such a way that the mechanical advantage of the actuator is exactly 1 (Ie the actuator only has to generate exactly the amount of force as the load on the moving arm)

This may seem simple at first glance, just attach the actuator at the far end of the moving arm, right?

But there is a necessary constraint: The other end of the actuator has to be fixed to the fixed arm AND has to be as close to the moving arm as possible, I can't just stick the other end to anywhere I want. So now I end up with this:
2020-05-08 (1).png

The problem is that torque generated depends on perpendicular distance to the pivot. So no matter how far out I fix the actuator, it's still at a mechanical disadvantage, since the actual perpendicular distance to the pivot is very small

Anyone know how I can fix this issue?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why not just fix the actuator to the moving arm? It just needs to push the load straight away from the end of the moving arm, right? Why does this force need to be transferred to the fixed arm through anything but the pivot bearing?

I guess I'm not understanding your problem statement so far...
 
TheShermanTanker said:
But there is a necessary constraint: The other end of the actuator has to be fixed to the fixed arm AND has to be as close to the moving arm as possible,
That's not a constraint, but an optimization goal.

TheShermanTanker said:
I can't just stick the other end to anywhere I want.
That's an ill-defined constraint.

TheShermanTanker said:
(Ie the actuator only has to generate exactly the amount of force as the load on the moving arm)
That's a constraint.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
951
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K