T.Engineer
- 86
- 0
in order to evaluate the Multiple Access interfernce should I find the mean and variance for the transmitted Signal?
Thanks a lot!
Thanks a lot!
The discussion revolves around evaluating Multiple Access Interference (MAI) in Time-Hopping Pulse Position Modulation (PPM) systems. Participants explore various factors that may influence the evaluation process, including signal characteristics and protocol considerations.
Participants generally agree on the complexity of evaluating MAI and the need to consider various factors, but there is no consensus on the specific steps or methodologies to be employed.
Participants mention various protocols and configurations that may affect the evaluation of MAI, indicating that the discussion is dependent on specific definitions and assumptions about the communication system being analyzed.
This discussion may be useful for individuals interested in communication systems, particularly those working with multiple access techniques and modulation schemes in the context of interference evaluation.
xez said:At least those, though often it's necessary to look at
other aspects of things like the signal crosscorrelations,
the protocol retry algorithms / protocol timings / packet or
transmission burst lengths, FEC coding, probability of
simultaneous transmissions, etc. etc.
Basically it depends a lot upon the protocols, the
modulation schemes, and the configurations of the
transmitters/receivers what the actual interference
statistics will be.
T.Engineer said:Please, what do you mean by Protocols?
I am going to use Pulse Position Amplitude Modulation and correlation receiver.