How to find oblique asymptotes for any function in general?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter benji
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around finding oblique asymptotes for functions, particularly focusing on the rational function y=(2x^2+5x+11)/(x+1). Participants explore various methods for determining oblique asymptotes, including polynomial long division and limits as x approaches infinity.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about how to start finding the oblique asymptote for the given function.
  • Another suggests using polynomial division to find the quotient, which represents the oblique asymptote.
  • Some participants propose dividing both the numerator and denominator by the largest power of x to simplify the function as x approaches infinity.
  • A participant shares a personal experience of using the tangent line method to find an asymptote, although it was marked incorrect in an exam.
  • There is a claim that the oblique asymptote is 2x+3 based on a limit approach, which is challenged by another participant who insists the correct asymptote is 2x+5.
  • Some participants argue about the validity of different methods for finding oblique asymptotes, emphasizing the importance of polynomial long division over other approaches.
  • A later reply discusses a more general method for finding oblique asymptotes applicable to functions beyond rational ones, involving limits and geometric considerations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the correct oblique asymptote for the function, with conflicting claims about whether it is 2x+3 or 2x+5. There is also disagreement on the methods used to find oblique asymptotes, with some favoring polynomial division and others suggesting alternative approaches.

Contextual Notes

Some methods discussed may depend on specific conditions or assumptions about the functions involved, and there are unresolved mathematical steps in the reasoning presented by participants.

benji
Messages
48
Reaction score
0
I'm having trouble figuring the oblique asymptote for this problem...

I haven't ever done one of these before so I really don't know where to start.

Here's the problem:

y=(2x^2+5x+11)/(x+1)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
http://home.att.net/~srschmitt/precalc/precalc-12-03-00.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hmm... I'm still not quite getting it.

I need to factor the numerator then, correct? But it comes out as an imaginary number?
 
You only need to do the polynomial division, so you can write it in the form of Quotient + Remainder/Divisor, because of Euclides Algorithm Numerator = Quotient*Denominator + Remainder.

The Oblique Asymptote will be the quotient.
 
The whole point of oblique (or horizontal) asymptotes is "what happens as x goes to infinity or negative infinity?"

With something like [tex]y= \frac{2x^2+5x+11}{x+1}[/tex] the simplest thing to do is to divide both numerator and denominator by the largest power of x in the denominator- here just x. [tex]y= \frac{2x+ 5+ \frac{11}{x}}{1+ \frac{1}{x}}[/tex]. Since those fractions with x in the denominator will go to 0 as x goes to either positive or negative infinity, it's easy to see that y approaches 2x+ 5.
 
I had an oblique asymptote question on my Calc I exam and I totally forgot how to do that. What I eventually did was to get an equation for the tangent at the point (a,f(a)) and then let a approach infinity, figuring that the tangent will coincide with the asymptote in that limit. Although I felt pretty good after coming up with that idea at the time and the answer was correct, I still received a big red cross through my solution :(
 
Just pointing out something...I know it's a really old thread !Someone pointed out earlier that for something like [tex]y= \frac{2x^2+5x+11}{x+1}[/tex] you can just divide by "x" and get that the asymptote is: [tex]y= \frac{2x+ 5+ \frac{11}{x}}{1+ \frac{1}{x}}[/tex]

However, that is not the case I believe. The asymptote is actually 2x+3, and it is found by:

= Lim x -> infinity, f(x) - (mx+b) = 0

So I would do long division, get : 2x + 3 + 8/(x+1) and then use the formula mentioned above:

= lim x-> infinity of 2x + 3 + 8/(x+1) - (2x+3)

that's equal = 0, hence the mx+b part is an oblique asymptote. Which is, 2x+3 = oblique asymptote in this case.

Hope this helps!
 
Hi, dale 123...you can check your answer by graphing it. Use a program if you're having trouble with the graph. Once it's graphed you'll see that your answer is not right. The correct answer is still 2x+5.
 
HallsofIvy said:
The whole point of oblique (or horizontal) asymptotes is "what happens as x goes to infinity or negative infinity?"

With something like [tex]y= \frac{2x^2+5x+11}{x+1}[/tex] the simplest thing to do is to divide both numerator and denominator by the largest power of x in the denominator- here just x. [tex]y= \frac{2x+ 5+ \frac{11}{x}}{1+ \frac{1}{x}}[/tex]. Since those fractions with x in the denominator will go to 0 as x goes to either positive or negative infinity, it's easy to see that y approaches 2x+ 5.

caddya89 said:
Hi, dale 123...you can check your answer by graphing it. Use a program if you're having trouble with the graph. Once it's graphed you'll see that your answer is not right. The correct answer is still 2x+5.

You're both wrong, dale 123 is correct. To find the oblique asymptote, you must use polynomial long division, and then analyze the function as it approaches infinity.

Taking the limit first, like HallsofIvy did, is wrong because 11/x and 1/x approach infinity at different rates, and therefore add to the numerator and denominator in slightly different ways.

If you are not finding the limit at infinity of the entire function, as in this problem, then you MUST write it in the form "term + term + ... + term", and analyze each individual term as x approaches infinity. This is because fractions can do unexpected things when it comes to limits.
 
  • #10
Oh, I am so embarassed! When I read my post I thought "wait, that's not right, you divide the polynomial to find the asymptote!". Don't know what I was thinking 5 and a half years ago. Thanks, dale123 and erh5060, for fixing that.
 
  • #11
So dividing by the largest power of x works for horizontal asymptotes but not generally for slant asymptotes. That's good to know.


Forgive me; you mean years ago. :wink:
 
  • #12
Ahh, yes, of course! I didn't make a mistake- what I wrote clearly must have been true 4½ years ago but not now! :smile:
 
  • #13
There is also a nice way to find oblique assymptotes for any function in general, not only rational functions, since the method described here works only for rational functions.

Let f(x) be sucha function and assume that L=ax+b is the oblique assymptote. Let P be any point in the graph of f and Q be a point in the line L, such that d(P,Q) is the shortest distance. Also let denote by K the point on the line L when we draw a perpendicular segment from point P to the x-axis. Now, after a little bit of geometry we find that L is an oblique assymptote iff

[tex]\lim_{x\rightarrow \infty}(f(x)-L)=lim_{x\rightarrow \infty}(f(x)-ax-b)=0[/tex]

If we divide the whole thing by x, and take the limit we find that:

[tex]a=lim_{x\rightarrow\infty}\frac{f(x)}{x}[/tex]

and

[tex]b=\lim_{x\rightarrow\infty}(f(x)-ax)[/tex]
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: StudentOfScience

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
17K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K