How to Find Particle Acceleration Using Conservation of Energy?

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on using conservation of energy to find the acceleration of two identical particles in an isolated system. The energy function is given, and participants explore the implications of its time derivative being zero, indicating energy conservation. They discuss the correct formulation of the first derivative, which includes terms for both kinetic and potential energy. A key point is that while the dot product yields a scalar, the accelerations are vector quantities, leading to the need for additional insights. Ultimately, the conversation concludes with the realization that total momentum conservation can aid in solving for the accelerations.
Ron_Gis
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Help

An isolated system of two identical particles, each of mass m, is described by an energy function
E = ½ m |v1|^2 + ½ m |v2|^2 + ½ k |x1 – x2|^2
How can I use conservation of energy to find the acceleration of each particle in terms of the position of the particle? I would be thankful if someone could give me a hint ?

Ron
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, the derivative of E with respect to time is zero, so...
 
krab said:
Well, the derivative of E with respect to time is zero, so...


Hello krab,

thank you for your help. Your approch to the problem is correct. If the total energy is conserved, the first derivative with respect to time of the given equation should be zero. I have some problems with the maths. Nevertheless, I think that the first derivative is given by

m a1 dot v1 + m a2 dot v2 + 0 where a1 = dv1/dt and a2 = dv2/dt

but I am not sure about this. Furthermore, it is not possible to divide a scalar through a vector, even if the solution is correct. I am too stupid to find the correct expression for the accelerations a1 and a2. I would be thankful if you could help me again.

Ron
 
Ron_Gis said:
, I think that the first derivative is given by

m a1 dot v1 + m a2 dot v2 + 0 where a1 = dv1/dt and a2 = dv2/dt

but I am not sure about this.
The first part is correct, but x1 and x2 change with time, so why did you get that the time derivative of ½ k |x1 ? x2|^2 is zero?
 
krab said:
The first part is correct, but x1 and x2 change with time, so why did you get that the time derivative of ½ k |x1 ? x2|^2 is zero?

Hello krab,

you are right again. The first derivative is given by

m a1 dot v1 + m a2 dot v2 + k (x1 – x2) dot (v1 – v2)

and this expression is equal to zero.

Nevertheless, the dot product is a scalar and I have to find an expression for the accelerations, which are vectors. I think that this is not possible, simply by rearranging this equation. Would you be kind enough to give me another hint.

Regards Ron
 
Ron_Gis said:
The first derivative is given by

m a1 dot v1 + m a2 dot v2 + k (x1 ? x2) dot (v1 ? v2)

and this expression is equal to zero.

Nevertheless, the dot product is a scalar and I have to find an expression for the accelerations, which are vectors. I think that this is not possible, simply by rearranging this equation. Would you be kind enough to give me another hint.

Regards Ron
You are right. You cannot get it from just this equation. Are you allowed to use the fact that in this isolated system, total momentum is conserved? If so then v1+v2=constant, so a1=-a2 and the result follows.

Alternatively, go back to the beginning and use a "virtual displacement". Pretend that you move say particle 1 by a vector dx1. Use the energy equation to calculate the difference in energy this displaced system would have. From the definition of work, you know that this energy difference is F1 dot dx1.
 
Hello krab,

I think that I have found the correct solution. Thank you for your help.

Regards Ron
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
969
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
757
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K