How to Find R from Electric Charge Problem

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around an electric charge problem involving forces between multiple charges. The original poster attempts to find the distance \( R \) based on the forces acting on charge \( q_1 \) due to charges \( q_3 \) and \( q_4 \), while also considering the influence of charge \( q_2 \). The problem is situated within the context of electrostatics and vector components of forces.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the components of forces acting on the charges, questioning the necessity of considering both x and y components. There are discussions about the correct expressions for the forces and the relationships between distances and angles in the setup.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with each other's reasoning, providing clarifications and corrections regarding the setup and calculations. Some guidance has been offered regarding the use of trigonometric relationships to express the x-components of the forces, but there is no explicit consensus on the correct approach or final answer yet.

Contextual Notes

There are indications of confusion regarding the application of trigonometric functions and the interpretation of the distances involved. Participants are also grappling with the implications of their equations and the potential for errors in their calculations.

kidi3
Messages
26
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



http://snag.gy/Zg3SO.jpg
At the moment is it question A


The Attempt at a Solution


A)
I've realized that Force applied by F_31 + F_41 = F_21

SO I've writte this equation up but Mathmathica, says there is an errror, and gives me an incorrect result.

http://snag.gy/rQ2kz.jpg

Mathmatica says it should {{D -> -0.225008}, {D -> 0.185008}}

The correct answer should be 2,27cm.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Did you take into account the directions of the forces F_31 and F_41? They have both x and y components. :smile:
 
No..
y -component must be zero since it is zero for q2
and the sum of q3 and q4 would negate the y component.
 
kidi3 said:
No..
y -component must be zero since it is zero for q2
and the sum of q3 and q4 would negate the y component.

Correct. So, you only need to work with the x components of the forces.
 
But aren't I doing it already?
 
kidi3 said:
But aren't I doing it already?

I don't think so. It appears to me that on the left hand side of http://snag.gy/rQ2kz.jpg you are using the full magnitude of the forces F_31 and F_41, rather than their x-components.
 
Ahh.. so you want me to skip
d/cos(\theta)
and just use d.. ?
 
Last edited:
kidi3 said:
Ahh.. so you want me to skip
d/cos(\theta)
and just use d.. ?

No, that part is correct, r = d/cosθ is the correct distance between charges 4 and 1. Draw a sketch showing the direction of the force F41. How would you express the x-component of F41 in terms of F41 and θ?
 
well the distance it moves is d.. so I have to write an expression for d..

So it would be rcosθ = d??
 
  • #10
Sorry, but I don't understand. What is moving a distance d? I thought you were trying to find the distance D so that the net force on q1 is zero.

Your first equation which you derived looks good except it doesn't take into account that you want the x-components of the forces to add to zero. (You already know the y-components add to zero by symmetry.)
 
  • #11
well q1 lies on a distance d from q3 and q4...

and isn't that distance given by r cos(θ)= d

where r is the Hypotenuse of the triangle`..
 
  • #12
kidi3 said:
well q1 lies on a distance d from q3 and q4...

and isn't that distance given by r cos(θ)= d

where r is the Hypotenuse of the triangle`..

Yes. All of that is correct. So, your expression (d/cosθ)2 in the denominator of your equation is correct. :smile:

Force is a vector quantity. The equation F = q1q2/(4∏εor2) gives the magnitude of the force. You need to determine the x-component of the force vector. Again, a sketch of the forces will help.
 
  • #13
... hmm would it then be
F_x = q1q2/(4∏εo(d))

Since both lies in a distance d?... or how..
 
  • #14
kidi3 said:
... hmm would it then be
F_x = q1q2/(4∏εo(d))

Since both lies in a distance d?

No. Consider the x-component of F31. Can you use trigonometry or similar triangles to find Fx in the attached picture?
 

Attachments

  • Force component.jpg
    Force component.jpg
    4.1 KB · Views: 435
  • #15
hmmm.. is it then cos(\theta)=r/x <=> x = cos(theta)/r
 
  • #16
kidi3 said:
hmmm.. is it then cos(\theta)=r/x <=> x = cos(theta)/r

Not sure what you are writing here. You need to find Fx, rather than x.
 
  • #17
Ahh.. I see what you mean now..
My drawings weren't correct..
But by using youre drawing I see that Cos(theta) = F_x/F <=> F_x = Fcos(theta)

So the expression for F_X = (q1q2/(4∏εo(d^2))) cos(theta)
 
  • #18
Yes. Good.

[EDIT: oops, you did mean r instead of d in the denominator, right? And the charges are q1 and q3 ]
 
Last edited:
  • #19
Hmm.. but i still get an incorrect answer.. :(

http://snag.gy/LDwAe.jpg

When i Tries to calculate D i get complex number..
 
  • #20
It seems to work out ok. Note that you don't want to plug in a negative value for q3 since you have set up your equation to state that the magnitudes of the forces balance out.
 
  • #21
D has to be 2,266 cm
But i get 1471,4 m...
 
  • #22
Well, I get D = 1.92 cm. :frown:

If you go to your original equation, put in the cosθ factor on the left to get the x-component, and then simplify, see if you get

2q3cos3θ/d2 = q2/R2

where I let R be the total distance between 1 and 2.

If so, what do you get if you solve for R?
 
  • #23
How do you get this ?
2q3cos3θ/d2 = q2/R2
 
  • #24
Well, what do you get if you cancel out everything you can between the left and right hand sides?
 
  • #25
But isn't what i have already done before..
 
  • #26
I don't know. You really haven't shown any steps involved in solving your equation. So, I can't tell you were you are going wrong.
 
  • #27
Start with your original equation and put in a factor of cosθ on the left side to take care of getting the x-component.

Then, do you see that q1 cancels out as well as 4πεo?

For now, just let r stand for the distance between #3 and #1 charge. So, instead of writing d/cosθ on the left, just write r. And on the right side, let R be the total distance between #2 and #1. So, instead of writing D+d just write R. Can you state what the equation simplifies to?
 
  • #28
These are my steps...

http://snag.gy/3oGJ5.jpg
 
  • #29
The first equation is incorrect. I see you have the cosθ factor to get the x-component. Good. But for some reason you forgot to write (d/cosθ)2 in the denominator to represent r2.
 
  • #30
Also looks like you didn't go from the second to the third equation correctly. [Shouldn't the fraction inside the square root be flipped over?]
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
13K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
12K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
6K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K