How to find the energy of an object that was at rest?

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
49 replies · 6K views
haruspex said:
No, 1.0198 would not be abbreviated to 1.012.
Then what would it be?
haruspex said:
and even if it were, subtracting 1 does not yield 0.12.
Yes sorry, I meant 0.012.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Davidllerenav said:
Then what would it be?
You will kick yourself when you realize the error you are making.
Repeatedly increment the final nonzero digit of 1.0198 until there are only two decimal places.
 
haruspex said:
Repeatedly increment the final nonzero digit of 1.0198 until there are only two decimal places.
Oh, I think I see it know, would it be 1.02?
 
haruspex said:
Yes.
So ##\Delta v=0.02## and the kinetic energy of the second rocket, the one that was at rest is ##E_k=m\Delta v^2= m(0.02)^2v_0^2##? Is t right?
 
haruspex said:
Not quite... you forgot a factor.
Oh, yes the ##\frac{1}{2}##, so it is ##E_k=\frac{1}{2}m\Delta v##.
 
Davidllerenav said:
Oh, yes the ##\frac{1}{2}##, so it is ##E_k=\frac{1}{2}m\Delta v##.
Now you forgot the square.
 
haruspex said:
Now you forgot the square.
Sorry... ##E_k=\frac{1}{2}m(\Delta v)^2= \frac{1}{2}m(0.02)^2v_0^2=\frac{1}{2}m(0.004)v_0^2##. It think it is correct know.
 
Davidllerenav said:
Sorry... ##E_k=\frac{1}{2}m(\Delta v)^2= \frac{1}{2}m(0.02)^2v_0^2=\frac{1}{2}m(0.004)v_0^2##. It think it is correct know.
I'm sorry to say that's another arithmetic error.
 
haruspex said:
I'm sorry to say that's another arithmetic error.
I see, I made a mistake when I squared 0.02, it is 0.0004, not 0.004. so ##E_k=\frac{1}{2}m(0.0004)v_0^2.
 
Davidllerenav said:
I see, I made a mistake when I squared 0.02, it is 0.0004, not 0.004. so ##E_k=\frac{1}{2}m(0.0004)v_0^2##.
Right. And you can simplify slightly combining the 1/2 with the 4.
 
haruspex said:
Right. And you can simplify slightly combining the 1/2 with the 4.
Yes, so simplifying I end up with ##E_k=m(0.0002)v_0^2##. And that's all, right?
 
Davidllerenav said:
Yes, so simplifying I end up with ##E_k=m(0.0002)v_0^2##. And that's all, right?
Perfect.
 
haruspex said:
Perfect.
Ok, thanks. I don't need to write the equations of the momentum of both rocket, do I?
 
Davidllerenav said:
Ok, thanks. I don't need to write the equations of the momentum of both rocket, do I?
No, you already used that.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Davidllerenav
haruspex said:
No, you already used that.
Ok, thank you so much for your help.
 
Davidllerenav said:
Yes, so simplifying I end up with ##E_k=m(0.0002)v_0^2##. And that's all, right?
There is a problem with this result. Neither ##m## nor ##v_0## are given in the problem description. Instead, what is given is ##E_0##, the initial energy of the moving rocket.

Can you express the result you have in terms of ##E_0## rather than in terms of ##m## and ##v_0##?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: haruspex
jbriggs444 said:
There is a problem with this result. Neither ##m## nor ##v_0## are given in the problem description. Instead, what is given is ##E_0##, the initial energy of the moving rocket.

Can you express the result you have in terms of ##E_0## rather than in terms of ##m## and ##v_0##?
Well, since ##E_0=\frac{1}{2}m v_0^2##, I think I can express the result as ##E_k=(0.0004)E_0## right?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jbriggs444
Davidllerenav said:
Well, since ##E_0=\frac{1}{2}m v_0^2##, I think I can express the result as ##E_k=(0.0004)E_0## right?
Yes, that is what I get as well.